Election Meddling – Silva’s $400,000 Arrogance
Make taxpayers shell out $400,000 or meddle in an ongoing election.
That’s the quandary in front of our city council tonight in the form of agenda item 4:
4. FULLERTON MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT REGARDING CITY COUNCIL VACANCIES
Consideration of an ordinance to repeal Fullerton Municipal Code Section 2.02.020 and follow procedure for filling City Council vacancies as set forth in Government Code Section 36512.
Without getting too much into the weeds the problem the city is trying to address is specific to the costs and ramifications of Jesus Silva winning the race for the District 3 council seat.
The voters in District 3 have 3 choices on their ballots; Greg Sebourn, Jesus Silva & Nickolas Wildstar. If either Sebourn or Wildstar wins this municipal code change does nothing in the foreseeable future.
If Jesus Silva wins then he vacates his current At-Large seat and we, by law, must hold a special election. That special election could cost us between $391,532 – $428,150 per the OC Registrar of Voters.
Silva likely didn’t even know he was risking socking the taxpayers with that hefty bill until somebody else pointed it out to him. Or perhaps he just didn’t care. That his wife was on council when the to be repealed ordinance was passed points more towards didn’t care than didn’t know.
We went through 2017 knowing this was an issue and the City Manager couldn’t be bothered to deal with it. Then most of 2018 came and went. Nothing. Instead of worrying about a near half a million dollar liability Ken Domer had the council worrying about which volunteers to fire from the various boards and committees around town. As a former member, I’m glad the Economic Development Committee is gone but if you’re going to muck with the municipal code perhaps worry about the parts costing us, or potentially costing us, real money before worrying about a committee that rarely met because it rarely had quorum.
Now this issue is on the City Agenda for the coming City Council meeting tonight. During an election.
Yes, the election is on 06 November but absentee ballots are already in the mail and thus the city is asking council to change the rules of elections DURING AN ELECTION. People will have already voted in District 3 BEFORE the council decides what to do tonight.
This is ridiculous.
I don’t want the city to have to spend $400,000 to fill a vacated seat if Silva wins in District 3. However – and this is a big however – Jesus Silva decided to run knowing that his run could cost us that much money and he did it anyways. That he did it anyways speaks to his character.
That is a political consideration and changing the rules during the election screams of a partisan fix to a problem Silva could have avoided by not throwing his at-large seat away in the quest for 2022 incumbency. Voters make decisions on issues that cost and matter less than $400k and deserve to judge this issue without council interference after the fact.
But how did we get here?
This is a nuancey ride so strap in for a moment and I’ll try to keep it simple.
Back in 2010 Shawn Nelson decided to jump from Fullerton and run for OC Supervisor. This caused a council vacancy and our City Attorney drafted legislation to address said vacancy. Ultimately Bruce Whitaker found himself in that seat after the ensuing special election. This issue has all but been ignored since that time as we have not had a council vacancy since Nelson.
Skip ahead to a few years back and some race-baiting opportunists sued the city on the premise that you can only represent people who look the same as you. Our idiotic state believes the same thing so our council, instead of fighting this ridiculous premise, opted to buckle to the pressure. They figured it was easier to just be bullied than fight to keep at-large seats. They also believed that smaller districts would be easier for them to win which is why they just so coincidentally managed to put themselves in different districts going forward.
This was gerrymandered nonsense with the best interests of the city at large being the furthest thing from the agenda.
Amusingly Jesus Silva won a seat to council at the same time the map was being approved by voters thereby negating the argument that a Hispanic candidate couldn’t win election to an at-large city wide seat. It turns out Kitty Jaramillo, one of the people who sued the city, was just a terrible candidate and it wasn’t innate racism keeping her off of the dais.
Skip ahead to 21 February 2017. Bruce Whitaker is mayor and the council needs to choose which two, of five, new districts is going to be up for election in 2018. Initially Whitaker sided with the (D)s, Silva and Chaffee, in choosing Districts 2 and 5 for 2018. This would have allowed Silva to stay at-large until 2020 but would have termed out Sebourn in 2018.
Had it stayed that way Sebourn, out of office in 2018, would have been running against incumbent Silva in 2020 who would surely put “Re-Elect Jesus Silva” on all of his signs. Too many voters are dumb and incumbency actually matters so both candidates coveted this advantage. During this February meeting Silva tried to feign ignorance of this fact and made the argument that Sebourn could just run against Silva in 2020 so whatever.
I’m not even sure the meeting was over when Whitaker started getting a good shellacking from activists and party members for throwing Sebourn, a fellow (R) and ally, under the bus. Be it because of the pressure or his own conscience Whitaker, as Mayor, brought the item back on 07 March 2017 and reversed course. This time he voted with Fitzgerald and Sebourn to put Districts 3 & 5 up for election in 2018 instead.
I made the point all along that they should have just pulled numbers out of a hat to make it fair and remove the partisan games and gamesmanship but integrity was just too much of a hurdle for any of the 5 on our council to comprehend.
Skip ahead to 2018 and Silva pulls papers to run in the newly created District 3 instead of serving out his term and waiting until 2022 to run against the incumbent. The very argument against Sebourn and incumbency that Silva made about District 3 NOT being up for election in 2018 now no longer seemed to apply. Political convenience and hypocrisy being what it is and all that.
An amusing side story to all of this is that if District 2 had been chosen to be up in 2018, Paulette Marshall Chaffee wouldn’t have carpetbagged into District 5 to trade on her husband’s name and Supervisor campaign. She could have run in District 2 without any issue and had a good chance of winning. Instead she ran to 5, got mad when people put up true signs, and now has pretended to withdraw from the race while leaving her propaganda all over the her pretend home district.
So to circle all of this back around now we have three people running in District 3. Silva, Sebourn and Wildstar and that causes a problem. A Silva sized problem.
If Sebourn wins nothing changes. Silva stays in his at-large seat until it ceases to exist in 2020.
It Wildstar wins nothing changes. Silva stays in his at-large set until it ceases to exist in 2020.
HOWEVER – if Silva wins – that could cost us close to $400,000. Why? Because Silva would then vacate his at-large seat and we’d have to hold a special election (owing to time left on that term) to fill the seat. It’s a city-wide, and not district, seat so the entire city would need to vote in a special election. That’s estimated to cost just about $400k.
Silva knew his running would cause a vacancy and he knew he was running for reelection. He wouldn’t have made a stink or cared about which districts were up for election otherwise back in Feb/March 2017. What did he do about it?
City Manager Ken Domer was interviewing for his gig as City Manager back when all of this went down in 2017 and he took over in June 2017. So what has Domer done about this problem in that time?
We have it on good authority that Domer “doesn’t read the blogs” and apparently cannot be bothered to take us Chronic Malcontents seriously. Maybe if he did he wouldn’t be meddling in an election after ballots are already being returned.
Another point of contention about my fellow Chronic Malcontents. I’d like to point out that we’re the only ones talking about this issue. I’ve seen nothing in the Fullerton Observer. Nothing in the Fullerton Rag. Nothing in the Flat Earth Society Informer. Nadda in the OC Register. Nadda in the Voice of OC. The list goes on and on.
So here we find ourselves with the Chronic Malcontents, and only us, trying to stop election meddling and promoting good government.
We’ll see what happens tonight at Council but I urge people to show up and tell the council that they need to not meddle in our election law during an election. That they couldn’t be bothered to worry about this now isn’t an excuse to give Silva a pass on his gross and incompetent opportunism. Silva may think he’s worth $400,000 to the taxpayers but I beg to differ and Silva’s arrogance deserves to stay a consideration to the Fullerton voters in District 3.
24 Replies to “Election Meddling – Silva’s $400,000 Arrogance”
Please explain the difference between the old process (to which we are going back?) and the one that replaced it. I need clarification.
The new process would allow the council to appoint somebody to that vacant seat. So if Jesus wins and the seat needs to be filled, the new council of Fitzgerald, Whitaker, Silva & District 5 winner (Chaffee?) gets to put somebody in Silva’s at-large seat until the 2020 election.
So if Silva wins, he votes on his own replacement? That smells.
Sounds like good stuff for a hit piece on Jaysus: political ego could cost the City of Fullerton $400,000!
Who’s ego is really in question? Greg or Bruce? If the election sequence, had been left alone after the decision had been made to put 2 (granted Paulette would have likely stayed in 2 as Doug has stated he wasn’t running) and 5 on the ballot, then the possibility of a special election would have been off the table. 1,4, 3 would have been up in 2020 and likely Jesus and Greg (who would have been off until the 3 election) would have ran then instead of this year. Jesus had no choice but to run this year or there would have been no seat at the end of his term. Bruce possibly cost us 400k by changing the vote to protect Greg. Let’s not even go into the fact that the council approved map makes no sense at all.
“Jesus had no choice but to run this year or there would have been no seat at the end of his term”
So fucking what? No choice? He could have run out his clock and redirected his attention to not teaching kids at the junior high.
But that’s not reality or how it played out. Whitaker voted one way and then realized he made a mistake so he corrected it as was his legal ability. Silva didn’t have the votes to keep it swayed towards him.
The dust had settled on that vote before Silva pulled papers for D3 so he could have served out his term until 2020 and run again in 2022 as a non-incumbent.
Ergo – Silva’s ego.
Jesus could have done the same thing you want Greg to do – finish out his term in 2020 and run against Greg in 2022
Save the City! Vote No on Silva.
I did address it. Check the footnote in the Rag post that supplied the image of the three candidates above:
I concur that it is inappropriate to consider this change during an election cycle. If I’d had more time this week I guess I might’ve written about how this agenda item looks like an avenue to appoint Sebourn to the empty at-large seat if he loses the District 3 seat to Silva, and that Greg Sebourn should recuse himself from this item tonight. Maybe someone took a poll and Silva is doing better than expected, and that’s why it’s on the agenda now? Just a wild guess based on nothing at all…
Fair points all, Matt.
I was more making the point that nobody was addressing the cost or problems therein.
The financial costs? They could apply anytime, not just in this awkward transition period. I regard it as the price of democracy.
One another note, although Whitaker was indeed elected during a special election, it was scheduled to coincide with a regular election, so it was presumably less expensive than the “stand alone” special election we would expect if Silva won.
Correct, it’s a timing issue. A special election can be consolidated if within 114 days.
It’s not a cost of Democracy, it’s a cost of arrogance and ego. I don’t care if it’s Silva or Sebourn potentially costing us $400,000. I’d slam either of them for this nonsense. It just happens to be Silva who decided he was worth that much to the ratepayers of Fullerton.
Exactly right. Public employees don’t give a rat’s ass about what things cost.
I doubt if Silva is polling very well. But let’s say he does beat Sebourn. Where would Greg get three votes?
The underpants gnomes?
Those would be Ling Ling’s votes
Sebourn has done NOTHING for Fullerton. He votes no on an unbalanced budget. So what? My dead aunt Masie does that,
No she doesn’t. She votes for Hillary.
Silva is sitting pretty. His wife is making good money plus she has her retirement from Fullerton School District. Two juicy pensions plus she may try for a third.
Silva will also reap benefits of two or more pensions. It is not enough for their champagne taste.
The vote was 3-1-1.
Whitaker, Fitzgerald and Silva voting to change the rule in the middle of an election.
Sebourn voting to keep things as they stand.
Chaffee recused himself.
There’s four left. They need three to get an appointment filled. I can’t see anybody in town getting three votes. Except maybe Tony Bushala.
Excellent synopsis of a ill conceived and dysfunctional process resulting from a poorly drafted settlement that produced districts. And voting on Election Day to SELECT a replacement (if needed) is completely manipulative and undemocratic. A pox on all of them!