As the Colony Turns; Is Lorri Galloway’s New “Home” Even Legal?

You can get there by bus...
You can get there by bus...

UPDATE: THIS ISSUE IS GETTING EVEN MORE FUN. ONE OF OUR FRIENDS HAS INFORMED US THAT ON BOTH THE RED AND BLUE BLOGS A FELLOW NAMED BILL TAORMINA POPPED UP TO DEFEND GALLOWAY. APPARENTLY HE OWNS THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION AND CLAIMS THAT IT IS “MIXED USE” THUS ALLOWING SOMEBODY TO LIVE THERE. HE GALLANTLY OFFERS TO TAKE ALL THE BLAME IF THERE IS A SCREW UP. THE CITY HAS IT LISTED AS OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ZONE.

WILL BILL AND LORRI RECEIVE VISIT FROM CODE ENFORCEMENT? WILL LORRI HAVE TO UNDERGO AN EMBARRASSING RELOCATION ELSEWHERE IN THE COLONY? WILL LORRI JUST PACK UP AND MOVE IN WITH LONELY HARRY AT THE BEAUTIFUL CALABRIA APARTMENTS? STAY TUNED FOR…

AS THE COLONY TURNS…

In what can only be described under the heading “hilarity ensued,” the Red and Blue blog clowns have picked up on our post about carpetbaggin’ Lorri Galloway’s new abode in Anaheim’s historic “Colony District.”

In our post we noticed the address – 1155 E. Lincoln – was in a odd enclave of relocated old houses. One of our Friends observed that the egregious Paul Kott had a commercial real estate sign on the property. At the eerie Red County blog the Colony’s self-appointed grande dame, Cynthia Ward, observed that the zoning was “light commercial/retail” (whatever that is) and thus Galloway’s “residency” constituted a code violation. Looks like she sicc’d code enforcement on Galloway.

You will soon receive a visit from Code Enforcement...
You will soon receive a visit from Code Enforcement...

We’re not experts on Anaheim zoning so whether a “caretaker” type individual is allowed to live on these premises is not known, to us.

Meanwhile, at the Blue County blog, Dan C-somethingorother – an ardent Galloway swain – typed up an “exclusive” response to the question, purportedly from Galloway herself. It came complete with a picture of Loretta Sanchez – a not too subtle trick by Danny Boy. But this post only made things worse, since according to it Galloway claims to have checked into the legitimacy of her new home with 1) the County Registrar of votes Neal Kelley; and 2) with the Anaheim Public Utililties Department.

Now why on earth would anybody check into this with the ROV and think that would mean anything? That’s just strange. And second, why would Galloway believe the Utilities Department would have any authority in the matter? Did it not occur to this simpleton to simply call up her own Planning Department and inquire? How long has this featherhead been on the Anaheim City Council – five years?

Right on cue, Ward dropped into the Blue miasma, now sharing city info that the Galloway parcel is zoned “low-intensity office,” still a seemingly incompatitble use for a residence.

I had my siblings over for Christmas, so it must be legal!
I had the family over for Christmas, so it must be legal!

At the end of the thread Dan C-somethingorother tried to deflect the issue, change the subject, and naturally tried to make it look like the big, bad Republicans were picking on his poor little sweetheart. Newsflash, Dan C.: we’ll beat her at the polls even if she doesn’t belong on the ballot, just like we dealt with Linda Ackerwoman!

Anyway, to us the legality of Lorri’s new home is really just an issue fun for its entertainment value. The real issue for us, of course, is that she, like her council colleague Harry Sidhu, is a carpetbagger from the 3rd Supervisorial District.

9 Replies to “As the Colony Turns; Is Lorri Galloway’s New “Home” Even Legal?”

  1. Does the poor woman own any clothing other than that red suit? Maybe she needs to go shopping at the Eli Home thrift store …

  2. This is actually a decent piece from you, Sippy! I’ll admit it drew a laugh, I especially like the re-using of the fortune cookie image. I guess not everything that comes from your vile hide is to be discarded immediately!

    1. High praise, indeed. Thanks. I’ll have it bronzed.

      I wonder if you’ll be so generous when you read my forthcoming post on our County Clerk – career politician!

  3. Biff,

    Wondering the same thing muself about not just Lori but also Loretta Sanchez and Sharon Quirk in Fullerton. What gives? Is this some sort of Red Hat Society insider deal? Nothing but red suits.

  4. looked up galloway’s bio and can’t find anything in her personal history that uniquely qualifies her for the role of orange county supervisor. went to her website and was disgusted by the immediate request to make a campaign contribution contrasted with her skimpy political platform and political philosophy. Lorri is just another barbie doll with political avarice

    1. Actually she has a lot in common with Pam Keller: parlaying dubious do-goodism into political opportunity.

  5. Three idiots (Galloway, Espinoza, Daly), two carpetbaggers (Galloway, Sidhu), and one turd (Fehar, I wanted an imbecile category but the American Association of Imbeciles wrote me a letter of great umbrage to placing Fehar in their group as he is not qualified to be an imbecile, a moron, but not an imbecile) = one brain of political mush.

    Add some embalming fluid and ya got yourself the ultimate walking brain dead politician!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.