Search Results for: trail to nowhere

Here’s the text of a recent City of Fullerton press release about upcoming activity at the dismal Union Pacific Park on Truslow Avenue. See if you can read it without gagging.

The City of Fullerton Parks & Recreation Department, Smile Generation®, and KABOOM! are teaming up to bring a new kid-designed, community-built playground to Union Pacific Park—revitalizing a beloved neighborhood space and ensuring local children have a safe, inspiring place to play.

On Saturday, September 13, volunteers come together to construct the playground in a single day, with a ribbon-cutting and photo opportunities at 2:30 pm. The build begins at 8:30 am at Union Pacific Park, 121 W. Truslow Ave., Fullerton, CA 92832. Media and community members are invited to attend and experience the transformation in real time.

“Union Pacific Park’s reopening represents a new chapter for this neighborhood,” says Edgar Rosales, Fullerton Parks & Recreation. “The new playground will be at the heart of the park—where children can play, and families can connect and grow.”

Union Pacific Park, which had been closed due to past soil contamination, has since been fully remediated and declared safe for public use—clearing the way for its exciting rebirth as a vibrant community hub.

This project also advances KABOOM!’s 25 in 5 Initiative to End Playspace Inequity, a nationwide effort to ensure every child—especially those in under-resourced communities—benefits from the physical, social, and mental health advantages of play. Smile Generation joins as a proud partner committed to community wellness.

Let’s just ignore the tsunami of silly bureaucrat-speak about under-resourced neighborhoods, new chapters, vibrant community hubs, families connecting and growing, inspiring places to play, and the like. That’s just the sort of hyped-up rhetorical nonsense you’d expect from any semi-literate municipal scribe. It’s actually pretty funny in an unintended way.

But what’s this nonsense about the park being closed for “remediation” of contaminated soil, but now having been declared safe? That’s just a damned lie. The remediation happened at least 15 long years ago. The fact is that City Hall kept the park closed due its attractive quality to borrachos, drug addicts, Fullerton Toker Towners, and homeless vagrants. It’s been sitting there, a ugly monument to the incompetence of Fullerton’s six-figure pensioners, and two generations of city councils that never bothered ask any questions.

This multi-million dollar disgrace is not a “beloved neighborhood space.” Nobody asked for it. Nobody wanted it outside City Hall employees with other people’s money to waste.

And now the current city council is poised to dump more millions into the beloved space even though there is nothing changed from the societal pathologies that kept it closed in the first place. And nothing has changed about the City’s inability to properly maintain the parks it already has.

Oh well, I guess this makes sense in a certain perverse way. The council just agreed to blow 2.5 million bucks on the Trail to Nowhere without a single backward glance to note the complete failure of the UP Park and the embarrassing “Phase I” of the so-called trail that doesn’t even connect to Phase II. The current council seems no more curious about past failures than their predecessors. In fact, they’re doubling down on the previous Union Park fiasco. The only difference is they seem to want to fail in smaller increments.

There’s something sad about an old woman who is slow-witted, vulgar, and mad.

Of course I’m talking about Vivian “Cannabis Kitty” Jaramillo, the woman who lost the election in Fullerton’s 4th District last year to Jamie Valencia, who happens to be smart, classy and good natured.

Jaramillo posted her take on the idiot Trail to Nowhere© that had a “groundbreaking” party last week.

Naturally, the bad sport has to take a shot at the “majority” that wanted to “obliterate” the ridiculous waste of money and it’s too bad they didn’t, like they should have. After all, the price tag to the City for this boondoggle exploded by 250% since the original grant application. Naturally, the ever-cultured Jaramillo made reference to them having a “hair up their butt,” giving us yet one more reason to be grateful that this uncouth harridan and her dope lobby supporters lost.

Well, according to Jaramillo, Egleth Nunnci led a charge, creating an unforgettable mental image.

But the most entertaining part of the the Jaramillo post was this picture of Ahmad Zahra, speechifying about the wonders of his pet project, a project that will die an orphan when it is shut down after a murder or two.

Zahra is a Noser, alright, as indicated by the graffiti behind him. Of the several definitions, the one that is preceded by the word “brown” seems really appropriate. And so for that, at least, we thank you Cannabis Kitty. Of course the irony of the rampant defacement of property along the railroad right-of-way escaped the attention of Jaramillo.

Well, this wasn’t exactly mail. It was a polemic that seems to have passed through a few hands before it ended up in our Boondoggle In Box. It’s about the notorious “Trail to Nowhere” project, set to break ground Wednesday. It is worth reproducing.

I have edited some of it for the sake of brevity, correct spelling and to protect the anonymity of the author whose permission to reproduce has not been given. The sentiments expressed are worth consideration and reinforce what FFFF writers have been saying all along.

As I watched the City Council meeting on tv recently regarding the Union Pacific Trail  it is becoming noticeable that these meetings are being hijacked by unhinged liberal women, young people from our city colleges, and non-English speaking women needing translators. It is clear that these individuals, many who are being groomed to create the “appearance” of a majority, are not tax paying homeowners. They are demanding that city leaders kowtow to their demands because they are the loudest voices in the room.  

It is unfortunate that Mr Dunlap chose to placate these individuals who had a disrespectful and inappropriate tone towards anyone who disagreed with them. It is appalling to see hundreds of thousands of city dollars, let alone a penny going towards such a ridiculous project as this, when there are so many other more serious issues. Drug dealers, drug addicts, homeless individuals, and criminals on bikes that come into our neighborhoods at night to steal and burglarize properties are the inhabitants of this property where they hang out at night. This is where you can see holes cut in the chain link fence at Independence Park, and many other locations where they leave their bags of possessions stuffed into the bushes. I liken this to Fullerton’s beloved Methadone Clinic that is next to the historic US Post office on Commonwealth that I had to visit when the Sunnycrest post office was temporarily closed. Meth addicts with tattoo tears next to their eyes hanging out at the post office blocking the stairs, and post office access causing fear as they jumped up and pretended to run after customers when they left. Why I have never been back to that post office.

The out and out lies about this being the perfect location for a nature trail is laughable yet disturbing. This location is as far as it gets from a peaceful nature locale. If you enjoy a “nature trail” with a jackhammer going off frequently, note that the BNSF Railway often hauls 60 to 150 cars each time they blow through the city. A person next to you talking are steps away from a roaring rail line – not a relaxing place for a conversation. These trains with up to 100 rail cars  are moving over 125 tons alongside proposed sections of this nature trail with families, and potentially children riding bikes. In addition, many speakers completely lied about this location being “lined with homes.” This location is flanked predominantly on both sides of the railroad with Williamson Ave. and Truslow  where there are solid tightly packed commercial/industrial/service businesses, and an extremely dense amount of the most filthy dirty auto repair businesses in Fullerton most notably on Williamson.

There are security cameras on all sides of Fullerton Ford. These cameras record the truly unbelievable crime taking place on Williamson and nefarious activities coming from the railroad area. Brazen organized crime gangs commit daring thefts at the tracks stealing hundreds of thousands of merchandise recently. A call was made to the Police Dept. of a crime in progress at the trains/rail line. This call to report a  crime was not reported to the “Call for Service” log that is on the Fullerton Police website. If there is a dead body, or crime in the area of the BNSF rail line, or significant organized crime moves the criminal activity onto the street that started at the rail  line, from what I understand these crimes may not be reported at the City Police Dept. When my husband first called, he was told by the police Dept. that these crimes near the rail line are under the jurisdiction of the Sheriff department!  When these crimes go unreported, this information then does not appear in the media. There are many mixed messages on this subject as the information changes depending on what officer you speak to. This creates a significant false sense of safety and security for the public at large, especially when a “nature trail” is built next to such a foul, unsafe environment. 

Last weekend we had to see with our own eyes the area of this proposed trail. As we drove and walked near these businesses along the rail line we noticed it was shockingly dirty, desolate, and trashy, with junk cars and refuse. More garbage, graffiti, empty bottles of alcohol and other disgusting items left on the other side of the fence at Independence Skateboard Park. I am curious if every City Council member walked the entire length of this proposed “nature trail?” Did they feel safe? Did they notice that this section of property along the BNSF Railway is one of the most decrepit, and disgusting areas of Fullerton? 

Our city is broke and we are now adding more long term maintenance costs. Those 176 trees and any bushes will be dead in no time. All sprinklers and water will be quickly abandoned (as in previous projects) and lighting will be broken and not maintained. The trash and garbage laying around our city right now can’t even be cleaned up! This walk along Williamson where there is a mattress, and refuse of all kinds that have been there for 9 months along with trash along the length of that street, at the end of cul de sacs and opposite side on Truslow is a constant. I am all for trees and landscaping, but the city has allowed miles of landscaping median shrubbery along Bastanchury and other areas to die. It was originally created as a “Scenic Corridor,” we now call Bastanchury a trash and weed corridor. Our city cannot maintain the parks we already have. This will be a rogue neglected area of crime that will go unreported because it lies on the BNSF railroad line. 

This sweet benign “perfect” location for this faux “nature” trail is a joke on the citizens of Fullerton. This project is like putting lipstick on a pig. I never use this phrase, but it fits this project perfectly. The public was fleeced by the screeching women at those meetings. The proposed renderings of the project are very misleading. Where I live – The Fullerton Observer is not the mouthpiece or moral majority for the City of  Fullerton.

I am sorry I was not at that meeting, I know this is too little too late.

Government agencies always love to talk about their transparency and how hard they work providing services to the folk who pay their salaries. But let’s not forget that secrecy is the unspoken watchword of all bureaucracies of whatever type.

Here’s a prime example of a dodge to a Public Act Records request. Somebody wants information about the low bidder on the infamous Trail to Nowhere©. The low bidder exactly matched the City’s “Engineer’s Estimate” to within five cents. Disclosure: this request was not made by FFFF,

The information requested is really specific. Just the sort of thing that avoids rejection based on over generalization or on requiring an onerous collection effort.

Uh, oh. The requestor made a BIG mistake.

He/she made his/her request on April 30th, 8 days after the bid. But the contract had not yet been awarded. Therefore, technically, there was no information to disclose because there was no awardee.

The requestor may or may not have known there was no award yet, and assumed there was. Or maybe he/she should have said “low bidder.” Now, you might say that the City’s Engineering Department are not mind readers, and so honestly said there were no records. And yet all of the information requested about low-bidder KASA Construction is known by the City, and that is obviously what the requestor wanted. Now, when (and if) the award is made the requestor will never get his request answered because it already has been.

I notice how this request was closed on the very morning the contract was expected to be approved by the City Council. Now, the City might have waited until the next day when they believed the question could be answerable. But no. Never answer a question you can avoid. Done and done.

There is a moral to this story, and that is that the City, even if they are capable of competently responding to a PRA request (wait for my next post), will never release information that it deems sensitive if it can help it, and you need to craft your request in a way that is specific enough and that contemplates the subtleties of the English language. And you will not get an explanation of how you failed.

Last night the City Council voted 3-2 to move ahead with a study of a Charter City status for Fullerton. Jung, Dunlap and Valencia voted to look into it. Zahra and Charles voted no.

It was painful to sit through comments, most of which were obviously scripted to attack the motives of Mayor Fred Jung, and were all full of nonsensical misinformation about staggering financial costs, legal entanglements, and of course the old standby cliché: if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

These Fullerton Boohoo worthies were obviously coached- and coached sloppily – by Zahra and Charles, and maybe even by reading the opinions of Sanskia Kennedy in the reliable Fullerton Observer – reliable to make stuff up if it helps the narrative. All of the excuses had been debunked, but that doesn’t matter. Commonsense is a not a common commodity among these folks.

Old grievances were aired of course, mostly the money pit Waste on Wilshire, and the Trail to Nowhere© redux in which “the people” have spoken – a few dozen out of a City of 160,000.

My favorite line of attack that was parroted by several speakers was that Fullerton has bigger problems – a fiscal precipice, and horrible roads. The fact that these disasters developed under General Law City status made their “argument” comically ironic. Is it or ain’t it broke?

Joshua Ferguson was on hand to deliver a hard, cold slap to the commentary by pointing out that the citizenry can become more involved in Fullerton affairs in the Charter process, not less. He was interrupted by boos from the faithful.

A Mr. Matt Leslie called in to support a study, and to admonish the speakers who had said (insultingly) that it would be too complicated to figure out and people would just vote yes (because they are so dumb), the typical top-down patronization of ordinary people by liberals. “The people want (fill in the blank)” doesn’t apply to a possible majority regular voters – only the claque of 12 or so who show up to harangue the council majority on a regular basis.

Another zoom caller expressed astonishment that so many adults, especially old ones, were so scared of the monster under the bed.

Which brings me (at last) to the real issue of charter status, expressed without bias. The proverbial devil is in the details. A charter can be as simple or as complex as people want. True the final charter version will be put on the ballot by the City Council, but lots of smart people will be able to scrutinize the text long before an election to approve or reject it. Don’t like it? Mount an anti-charter campaign. Zahra and Charles must have lots of campaign money lying around. Put it to work and get voters to just vote no.

I would be remiss if I failed to point out the noxious presence at the meeting of our old friend, Vivian Jaramillo, still very bitter about losing in last fall’s election, and then being rejected as a planning commissioner. Her “argument” was that a charter would make “Little Dictator” Fred Jung able to give all the City’s construction jobs to the Bushala Brothers, a claim based on her own long standing vendetta with the Bushalas, not any facts in evidence.

As we’ve just seen the idiotic half-mile Trail to Nowhere© now requires almost twice as much City money as it did when the City Council approved it 16 months ago. As the project languished in bureaucratic limbo for that time the City cost has gone up from $330,000 to $600,00 – with no explanation from the City Manager or the City Engineer – just the feeble “increased scope” excuse.

Lest you think this is a one off, you’d do well to think again.

I went back to the original grant application submittal. You may remember the document – the one so full of bullshit you need wings to stay above it.

Here’s the heading of page one:

Please note that when the City Council approved the grant application the City cost was a mere $170,720. By the time the Council approved the project, the contribution from the Park Dwelling Fund (derived from a fee from development, restricted to new park facilities) jumped to the $330,000 amount seen above. So before it was finally approved, nobody bothered to tell the City Council that Fullerton’s contribution to the senseless project had jumped a whopping 94%.

And now the City’s responsibility has metastasized to $630,000, an unbelievable increase of almost half a million bucks over the original cost used to pitch the project. If you like math, the overall increase is 290% from Day One. The Council wasn’t told, public wasn’t told, and I’m pretty sure the State wasn’t told.

Just think about it, Friends. An almost 300% increase and not a single person in City Hall raised the issue of an arithmatic cost escalation. And there’s no reason to suspect there won’t be more increases, courtesy of change orders, and that those will be approved behind closed doors by the City Manager, with no scrutiny by the public or by Councilpersons Dunlap, Jung or Valencia. Zero Zahra and Shameless Charles showed they don’t give a damn about taxpayer money.

Here’s an example of just one item of new work: we already know there is no line item in the bid for reworking access to the 10 toxic plume testing wells on the trail site. How much will that cost? Who knows? Does anybody even care?

The City Council would be very wise to explore not only the reason for the alleged “increase in scope,” but also to inquire about future budget increases due to unforeseen conditions – the low bidders best friend.

An alert Friend directed my attention to the online version of the Fullerton Observer in which Sanskia, the younger Kennedy sister, is informing people that they will have a second chance to weight in on the City Council’s April 1st decision to severely restrict where non-governmental publications can be disseminated on City property.

A second chance? How come? Let’s let Skasia tell us in her own words:

“During a council meeting on April 15, Mayor Protem (sic) Dr. Shana Charles and Councilmember Dr. Ahmad Zahra expressed their discontent with the decision, asserting that the council had not been presented with all necessary information before making such a significant ruling. Both officials indicated their intention to rescind the policy at the upcoming meeting scheduled for May 6.“

Hmm. The implication here is that these two have decided to re-agendize the matter on May 6th. A person with a little bit of common sense might well wonder how a council minority could resurrect an issue previously decided by a majority of the council. Well, of course they shouldn’t be able to; the policy of permitting two members to agendize an issue presupposes that it is a new item, not one previously decided by the City Council. Otherwise a minority could keep dredging up decided issues, ad infintum. A baboon could grasp this.

But no. You see “necessary information” of some sort has popped up, according to Zahra and Charles, not previously presented by the staff or the City Attorney. This alleged insufficiency is their pretext for stirring the whole thing up again.

Why does this seem familiar?

Because Zahra and Charles pulled the same horseshit on the Trail to Nowhere at the end of 2023 when they claimed that new revelations by the State required more public hearings. The City Manager, Eric Levitt, with the blessing of City Attorney Dick Jones permitted the issue to be put on the agenda. At the end of 2024 Charles trotted out the “new information” schtick to keep the Wank on Wilshire on life support until Vivian Jaramillo (hopefully) could get on the council and keep it going.

The main point seems to be about about giving Charles an excuse to change her vote. She will have to try to explain what “new information” has caused her to change her vote, and that might be unintentionally funny. But that wouldn’t be the only outcome.

If the issue is agendized for the meeting on May 6th by Levitt, the Council majority will be subjected to the usual hours long harangues from Fullerton Boohoo and the Kennedy Sisters. They, finally, may even be caused to wonder about the future of CM Eric Levitt and Dick Jones of the “I Can’t Believe It’s a Law Firm.”

But probably not, Fullerton being Fullerton.

Anyhow, we’ll know for sure May 1st when the May 6th meeting agenda is published,