One of the Worst Decisions

Your Fullerton City Council majority — consisting of Fitzgerald, Chaffee, and Silva — made one of the worst decisions in recent memory last night.

Desperate to protect their pensions, and to keep pension contributions at a minimum, the Fullerton Police Officer’s Association (FPOA) approached the City about extending their contract.  They voted yes.

CalPERS pension costs are skyrocketing as a result of poor investment returns, and far too optimistic rates of return.  To “correct” this problem, CalPERS is demanding the City of Fullerton pay more in the years ahead.  The table shows pension costs for FPOA members which consist of Police Officers, Police Corporals, Police Sergeants, and a small handful of non-sworn civilian employees, such as Police Dispatchers.

The table above uses the current fiscal year as a baseline (on the bottom row) to get a feel for the pain ahead.  Beyond the current fiscal year, the projected pension costs for FPOA employees will cost Fullerton residents — at the very least — an additional $12.3 million through June 2022.

That’s $12.3 million of new money the City of Fullerton doesn’t presently have.

The timeline of the FPOA contract status is illustrated above with the agreed to “concessions” which are disingenuous at best.  As noted, the contract extension runs to 2021 at the earliest, and possibly 2022 if FPOA decides to exercise that option.

You might be thinking to yourself, wait a minute, if their current contract expires June 30, 2019, why not negotiate a new contract at that time to get a better handle on the escalating pension costs?  That’s precisely the problem.  Instead of acting in good faith for Fullerton residents, council members Fitzgerald, Chaffee, and Silva rolled over to satisfy the public safety unions that paid big money to help them get elected.

The worst part about the FPOA contract, and the extension handed out last night, is the City cannot reopen negotiations to combat rising pension costs.  The promises are now etched in stone through 2021 or 2022 regardless of what CalPERS does.

All very troubling, not just for basic principles, but because the California Supreme Court is expected to rule in 2018 on the so-called “California Rule” which prevents government agencies from reducing already promised pension benefits.  The court’s decision will carry significant implications either way.  If they overturn or modify the “California Rule,” Fullerton could have sought to renegotiate FPOA pension benefits upon the expiration of the contract in June 2019 and saved Fullerton residents millions of dollars.  Conversely, if the “California Rule” is upheld, CalPERS will likely respond by further lowering the discount rate (assumed rate of return).  A lower discount rate will cost the City of Fullerton tens of millions more in the coming years.

At last night’s meeting, the introduction of a new financial forecasting tool was presented earlier in the night, before the FPOA extension came up for a vote.  The gentleman making the presentation noted that his model predicts a U.S. recession in the year 2020 — right in the middle of the FPOA extension.  I was at the meeting and brought this up when it came time for the FPOA vote.  I also pointed out that Fullerton’s brand new City Treasurer, who started on January 8th — just eight days prior — should be given a chance to review the FPOA proposal and offer his thoughts to the City Council.  After all, the existing FPOA contract didn’t expire for another 18 months, so what’s the rush?

Council member Sebourn registered his opposition to the FPOA proposal, and then, without another council member saying a word, it passed with a 3-2 vote, Sebourn and Whitaker voting no.

Last night’s recklessness puts us a couple steps closer to municipal bankruptcy.  When the Library is forced to cut hours or close completely, when Parks and Recreation has to shutter the community center, when Public Works has to stop paving streets and repairing broken water mains, you now know exactly which three council members to thank.  It was failure on full display.  As usual.

13 Replies to “One of the Worst Decisions”

  1. How did I forget? They also gave FPOA members 25 hours of PAID discretionary leave per year, to sit at home and do nothing. So much for improving police response times, and customer service, like Jennifer Fitzgerald so often loves to harp on about.

  2. Good. The sooner this city reaches insolvency, the better off we will all be (except for the overpaid safety heroes.)

    1. News to first responders, we the rest of the world respond all day everyday, so while you wait around on your butts waiting for something to happen, we are working all day, we are the ones stocking shelves, cooking your meals, cleaning, building etc. no vacation, no health care, no pension, no nothing!! We work all day long while you wear out the seat of your pants!

  3. I understand why liberals Chaffee and Silva would vote in favor of their union masters, but isn’t Fitzgerald supposed to be some type of conservative? What a two-faced piece of garbage. She can rot in hell.

  4. Great post. I wish all the Fullerton residents could understand just how fiscally irresponsible those three sneaks are voting! the assumption that growth will cover the payouts are delusional.

  5. Mark my words, they will take the 2022 option.

    And that means just what the chart shows. Fullerton taxpayers lose $12.3 million while FPOA members sacrifice just $1.6 million.

    They’re nothing but a bunch of parasites.

  6. Ffffers you are all so sad! Sitting in your moms basement complaining about anything and everything! The best part is no one reads this lame blog as you can see by the lack of comments on any of these pointless articles.

    1. Apparently YOU read the blog and respond. But, instead of actually making some kind of objective comments, pro or con, you go down the usual road of just insulting the blog posters. Can you give us any solutions to the cesspool in Fullerton? Perhaps prove the posts wrong, point out the fallacy of their arguments, show factual errors? Perhaps you could look over the last few posts and show everyone where the poster really, REALLY, didn’t know what they were talking about.

      Objectively, of course.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *