I Aint a Swallerin That Archives - Friends For Fullerton's Future

December 31, 2025December 31, 2025Ahmad Zahra

At the Fullerton Observer Raising Awkward Facts Gets You Nowhere

One of our commenters recently pointed out the “reply” string on a Fullerton Observer post supposedly written by a guy named Kevin Curriston, a chap who doesn’t appear to be the literary type. Some of comments are pretty good. Naturally Sharon, the elder Kennedy Sister, leaps into the breach to validate the theme of the essay. Amy the Angry Little Bird is on hand too, to lend her support.

A guy named Brian calls bullshit on the supposition that 40 public commenters represent anybody but a small percentage of Fullertonions.

That premise is not well-received in Fullerton Boohooville.

I particularly like Brian’s wicked request for Kennedy to share some of Zahra’s vast filmography.

A Mr. Matt Leslie reminds everybody that Zahra’s flipped on his first real decision and in doing so disenfranched a whole bunch of people when he appointed Jan Flory to complete Jesus Quirk-Silva’s term.

Here’s the reply thread, reproduced:

15 replies »

Matt LeslieDecember 27, 2025 at 9:48 amThe author neglects to inform readers that Council member Ahmad Zahra did not attend this important meeting. Although it seems unlikely that other council members would have supported him for mayor, he had the opportunity to support Shana Charles for the position, but was not present to do so.Ed Response: Councilmember Zahra had a work trip out of town so did not attend the meeting.
- BrianDecember 29, 2025 at 2:39 pmI see you seem to know a lot about council member Zahra, just what does he do for a living?
  - Sharon KDecember 29, 2025 at 4:35 pmZahra is a filmmaker. Currently the only Councilmember who doesn’t work is Jung. You can discover this kind of thing through the form 700 financial filings of each Councilmember. – though I notice Valencia has failed to file. Not sure why.
    - BrianDecember 29, 2025 at 6:46 pmWow, that is fascinating. Can you point me in the direction of some of his work?
AmyDecember 29, 2025 at 8:12 amDunlap and Jung continue to gaslight the public and delude themselves by saying that public commenters are not representative.Every meeting brings new attendees infuriated by the actions of the majority, but Jung, Dunlap, and Valencia keep telling themselves the public’s voices don’t count. It seems they can’t bring themselves to accept that anyone could possibly disagree with their blatant corruption and repeated defiance of the wishes of the public.
- BrianDecember 29, 2025 at 2:27 pmI’d imagine if you took two seconds to step outside your bubble, you may realize that in a town of 140,000+, 30 or 40 people don’t even represent a decimal of a percentage. And just because you comment, it doesn’t make your comments true. Much like this publication and the liberties it takes with the truth all the time.
  - Sharon KDecember 29, 2025 at 4:56 pmBrian – sounds like you are talking to yourself on that critique.
    Most people are busy with their lives and don’t pay that much attention. And of course over half of our town’s 140,000 or so residents are children. Others have jobs that interfere with council meeting hours, etc. Some don’t think it is possible to fight city hall. Some are just not interested. Having 40 people show up at a council meeting and speak on an issue is huge.
    If people didn’t come out we wouldn’t have any trails in town; there would be a polluting flour mill across from Amerige Heights; the toxic park and McColl dump site would not be cleaned up; our museum center would be high rise office building; we wouldn’t have saved FOX or Coyote Hills and much much more.
    Some politicians – just out for themselves and narrow special interests – can fool people for awhile but eventually the truth of their actions come out
  - AmyDecember 29, 2025 at 5:33 pmThose who disagree are welcome to attend a city council meeting, but for some reason they have not.Jung received unanimous opposition to his taking of the mayorship at the last meeting. Dozens of public comments unanimously supported creating a fund for immigrant support against ICE raids and kidnappings. Dozens still attended to beg city council not to kill the Walk on Wilshire – twice; the paltry number of voices in opposition were those financially aligned with Jung and Bushala. If opposition exists, it has yet to show up to city council meetings.
    - BrianDecember 29, 2025 at 6:44 pmLike I said, just because you comment, doesn’t make your comments true. With this statement you proved my point again.
      Full of inaccuracies. Do better.
      - AmyDecember 29, 2025 at 9:19 pmI don’t see how, but okay. I’m sure you know best.
    - Matt LeslieDecember 30, 2025 at 8:59 amAmy, I opposed Walk on Wilshire for several reasons, not because I was “aligned” with anyone. Please be careful not to be dismissive of the concerns of those with opinions contrary to your own.
      - AmyDecember 30, 2025 at 5:11 pmI fully respect your right to your opinion, but I do disagree that the bollards – comparable to those used on nearly every trail in OC – were an actual impediment to cyclists traversing the Walk on Wilshire and merited removal of the whole thing. I definitely wouldn’t go so far as to say any opinion I disagree with is invalid. That would be absurd. But the argument seemed so ridiculous as to be disingenuous to me. Perhaps I’m reading too much into it.That said, as one of the fewer than 10 detractors, you’re certaintly entitled to your opinion. I hope the dismantling of the Walk on Wilshire that so many enjoyed brought you great happiness and satisfaction.
  - FrankDecember 30, 2025 at 2:00 pmStep out of your bubble pal.
Sharon KDecember 29, 2025 at 9:05 pmBrian – if you are talking to me – you are right — I guessed that there are way more children than there are at least according to the stats I just looked up that say there are only 32,000 children under 18 in Fullerton.
But when you are figuring out percentages of people think about the fact that – according to the OC Registrar of Voters – only 7,432 voted for Jung; 9,546 for Dunlap and 3,489 for Valencia in the last election. That certainly does not make a majority. Some of those who voted for Jung, Dunlap are among those who have come to council and said they were unhappy with their votes on various things and felt fooled when the vote to keep Walk on Wilshire open – turned into an expansion suggested by the two – and then that vote was postponed until after the election and both Jung and Dunlap proceeded to vote no.
Really the point is that we residents of town want a fun place to live that we are proud of where people want to visit and small businesses can thrive. Dulling it down by reducing unique features, curtailing music, outdoor patios, walking paths, safe bike paths, etc does not make our town attractive to anyone. And everything turns into a big fight with residents begging for good decisions. And I am not alone in really hating their recent decision to not help residents targeted by ICE and other weird unfair decisions like not following fair rotation so every district gets chance to have their representative as mayor.
Matt LeslieDecember 30, 2025 at 10:51 amAnd, by the way, if you want to talk about steamrolling over public opinion go watch the videos of Ahmad Zahra’s first council meetings in 2018. Dr. Zahra first voiced support for a special election to fill a vacant council seat, a position in line with nearly all public speakers on the issue during meetings. But he quickly changed his position entirely, aligning himself with a council majority who disregarded expressed public opinion in favor of an election and instead voted to appoint a someone to the vacant seat.Zahra’s swing vote to appoint a council member instead of holding an election disenfranchised an entire district of the city, instead foisting upon them an unelected representative for the two full years remaining in the council term. This decision was of much greater significance, in my opinion, than choosing a mayor from among sitting council members (something the appointed council member got to do). Where was the concern for “the public” then?

December 12, 2025December 13, 2025Boohooism

Grand Opening for Trail to Nowhere

by The Fullerton Harpoon48 Comments

It’s tomorrow, don’t be late for the Big Event. Let’s let Sanksa Kennedy of the Fullerton Observer spell it all out.

Why write about news when you can try to make your own! (Photo by Julie Leopo/Voice of OC)

The Grand Opening Ceremony will begin at 10 am at Independence Park, 801 West Valencia Drive, Fullerton. Be among the first to walk, bike, and enjoy this brand-new greenbelt trail connecting our neighborhoods with safe, beautiful, and sustainable pathways. This long-awaited project brings new trees, lighting, and enhanced recreation opportunities right to the heart of our community.

An initiative aimed at transforming an unsightly stretch along an old railroad spur into a vibrant community trail has faced multiple challenges and opposition from a few of the council members, even with $1.78 million in state funding backing it.

After significant community pressure, Council Member Dunlap ultimately changed his stance, voting in favor of the construction contract alongside fellow council members Zahra, Charles, and Valencia. In a not so surprising turn, Mayor Fred Jung stood alone in opposition to the project.

The Union Pacific Trail project stands as a testament to the community’s commitment to development, equity, and civic engagement. Residents are hopeful that this project will be the beginning of more green space for South Fullerton and will create a welcoming space for everyone.

Wow, that’s awful rosy, concluding as facts things that haven’t happened, and of course never will.

Saska is still promoting the same old lie that this boondoggle “connects neighborhoods.” It doesn’t even connect to Phase 1!

It’s a total waste of money, but it sure is short…

Poor Sanka doesn’t seem to grasp the nonsense of an unsightly stretch being the heart of “our community.” Not mentioned is the fact that the unsightly stretch is still there, like it always was and hoping that a silly (and expensive) trail will transform anything is just preposterous wishful thinking.

In Sinka’s tiny brain spending money equates to “equity” regardless of outcome – that’s already been decided by the two dozen drumbeaters for the Trail to Nowhere. She reminds us about the $1.8 million from the State as a reason this should have always been an easy call. She neglects to inform Observers that the City’s cost ballooned from $170,000 to $630,000; but hey it’s a testament, alright. A testament to stupidity and lousy stewardship of public money.

How many of the people who promoted this mess in rhapsodic terms will even be around in a year’s time to calculate the running costs, the graffiti, the crime, the lack of usage, the dead and dying vegetation? None, of course.

Tomorrow this utter waste of $2.3 million will have a hundred parents. In December 2026 it will be an orphan.

December 9, 2025December 10, 2025A Manfro All Seasons

Something Fishy in Fullerton

by Grover Cleveland36 Comments

On last Tuesday’s City Council closed session agenda, an item popped up that surely bears close examination.

This is about an appeal regarding a decision involving “post retirement employment.” That means it involves CalPERS the massive pension program for public employees in California. Obviously CalPERS came down on these four individuals listed for violating terms of retirement, terms meant to make retirement a serious decision. I’m moderately familiar with the rules. The basic ones are that if you are officially retired you can’t go back to work for any CalPERS agency for more than 960 hours a year, and you can’t take on the responsibilities of a full-time employee.

Friends may remember Jeff Collier, former City Manager of Whittier, who was the “Interim” City Manager after Steve Danley (an OCERS retiree and therefore eligible), for a while in 2021-22. Did Collier work more than 960 hours? Can an “Interim” qualify to get around CalPERS restrictions? I don’t know.

I don’t remember a Cindy Collins, but a do recall Gregory Pfost, retired head planner from Laguna Beach who washed up on Fullerton’s shore.

Finally, there’s Eddie Manfro, retired City Manager from dysfunctional Westminster who hired on a few years back as an HR consultant, I think, and became the de facto HR Director. He is now the Interim City Manager.

The one thing all these individuals have in common is that they were and are, well-aware of the limitations placed on CalPERS retirees, so whatever the violations are that are being appealed, should have been avoidable.

I would like to know how Fullerton got stuck with this embarrassment and who is paying the legal costs for the waiver process and the appeal. I get the feeling we are paying.

December 5, 2025December 5, 2025Boohooism

Who is Your Favorite Fullerton Public Commenter?

by The Fullerton Harpoon38 Comments

There is a conga line of eccentric bloviators who keep showing up at Fullerton City Council meetings to berate the so-called “council majority.” Some of them are quite abusive and accusatory. Some then try, or pretend to try, to get the objects of their disapprobation to do something for them. Any attaching tissue to reality seems to be non-existent.

Who is your favorite?

December 4, 2025December 4, 2025Ahmad Zahra

Zahra Agonistes & Observer Silence

by Grover Cleveland23 Comments

That Ahmad Zahra sure puts on a show for his cult followers. During Tuesday’s “council communications” he went on a pathetic 11 minute emotional roller coaster ride, a real self-pity party that was full of his special brand of histrionics – gestures, knowing nods, glances at who knows who, dramatic pauses, pained looks, and near-tears expressions.

Good Lord, what a valediction! Departing hero, victim, saint, champion of the downtrodden and upholder of truth and justice.

Of course it was a damn waste of everybody’s time. But when you’re a self-aggrandizing narcissist that’s the last thing to worry about. In fact, your speech is just the capper to a long conga line of oddball public commenters you have stirred up to attack your political enemies. And he still has a whole year to keep repeating the performance.

Meantime, the Kennedy Sisters who run the pretend news outlet Fullerton Observer still haven’t mentioned Zahra’s decision not to run for re-election. You would think Sanka and Sharon Kennedy would fall all over themselves to shower sickly sweet encomiums upon the object of their infatuation. But no. The proverbial deafening silence.

Zahra put out his statement over two weeks ago and there has been no mention on the Observer site of Zahra’s departure at the end of 2026. We know that the Observer operation is incompetent and completely biased, but this neglect has got to be deliberate. Why?

It’s been speculated, and with some justification, that the Sisters are waiting until the Democrat Machine can find and endorse a replacement for Zahra; and that once all the endorsements are locked up and any District 5 Dem rivals swept aside, all will be revealed and the anointed one revealed to hallelujahs and hosannas.

The anointing oil was greasy and left fingerprints, and didn’t take…

This doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. What difference does it make to let Fullerton Boohoo know Zahra’s story – even the implications? That might even look like sort of real journalism.

But hey, these are the same dummies who aided and abetted Scott Markowitz in 2024. Maybe they really believe they need to keep the cat in the bag while they find another Cannabis Kitty Jaramillo to roll out.

November 30, 2025November 30, 2025A Manfro All Seasons

The Strange Case of the Ambulance Bonds

by Disillusioned Ex-Hippy21 Comments

Back in March 2025 the Fullerton City Council decided to fire the City’s ambulance contractor and take the responsibility in-house. Why? Well, naturally there’s the official story, which is that there will be some sort of saving, which is nonsense, since it means adding 20 new public employees on the payroll, and was all based on wishful thinking. So instead of shopping out the paramedic business like Placentia did, Fullerton did the opposite, requiring acquisition of ambulance rolling stock and the various other appurtenances like gurneys, etc.

On this Tuesday’s Council meeting Agenda Item #10 proposes a payment plan for this nonsense. Guess what? It looks desperate. City staff is still proposing to finance the acquisition of all the ambulance stuff through acquiring debt, via a master agreement with Bank of America to buy City bonds at a coupon rate of 3.5%, and then use the proceeds to lease ambulances.

Well, there she goes. Don’t worry. There’s more where that came from…

Yes, you read that right. We’re paying for Fire Department empire creation with $2,000,000 credit. The capital repayment and interest on the bonds would amount to $2,175,000 by the time the last bond matures in November 2031. And let’s not forget the dough paid to bond counsel and financial consultants (UFI) who are selling this deal. And oh, yeah, let’s consider there’s now insurance, maintenance, fuel, etc., of vehicles owned by the lessor (BofA), which was all glossed over last April 1st, as was the cost of financing which is over $200,000.

The single Agenda Item #10 staff report sentence justifying the financing is laconic, and notable for what it doesn’t say; that the City still plans to finance the purchase orders for this equipment supposedly issued in April. Here’s all we are told:

“Urban Futures, Inc. (UFI), the City financial advisor, and staff determined private placement financing offers the most beneficial and cost-effective solution for the City.

But there is no explanation why. None at all. Zip. Is the City borrowing $2,000,000 at a lower interest rate that it is making in an investment pool? Who knows? The City Council and the public aren’t informed, just as they weren’t informed when financing was proposed back in April.

The fun aspect of this is that the lease of these ambulances would be rent-to-own, a little con – making the credit-risk-uninformed think they are getting something great. I mean, who doesn’t want to own stuff, right? What good is a owning a six year old old ambulance? I don’t know, but my guess is they depreciate really fast. Maybe even faster than rent-to-own toasters.

I really don’t know what to say about this completely unnecessary move. If the Council had just voted no on the unsolicited plan from the FFD we wouldn’t be looking at having to cover any loan vig at all. Neither the Councilmembers who voted for this – Zahra, Charles, Jung and Valencia had much if anything to say about this bond/lease back in April.

This is how I bought my first car, a 1991 Yugo!

Of course Zahra and Charles don’t give a rat’s ass about wasting money, especially when they script some sort of feel-good performance. Hopefully, Jung and Valencia will change their minds about this resistible offer, but I’m not optimistic. Maybe Dunlap can talk some sense into them.

With Fullerton tottering on the edge of financial meltdown the Council’s behavior towards the fire department (and its union employees) has been highly irresponsible. In October they accepted a one-time FEMA grant to hire a platoon of new “fire fighters” that we will become completely responsible for in 3 three short years, pensions and all.

No, I’m not optimistic at all. The financial leveraging is bound to be used as a pretext to pass a sales tax increase next year. And what if that fails?

November 26, 2025November 29, 2025Boohooism

Shana Charles Lies. And Cries.

by Mr. Peabody26 Comments

At the last Fullerton City Council meeting Councilwoman Shana Charles put the Les Amis as victim narrative on display again. Here’s what she said:

First, Pilgrim Café was not on the now-mercifully defunct Walk on Wilshire. Neither was Les Amis, of course. Those were just a couple of casual lies to remind everyone of her great success – WoW – instead of what it really was: an expensive, stupid, feel good, boohoo urban intervention that impeded traffic and hurt small businesses on Wilshire Avenue.

That led her into the revelation of a “coming soon” restaurant sign on the building where Les Amis is housed! Poor, delicate Shana was devastated – almost near tears at any moment, it seemed – at the likelihood that Les Amis was suddenly going to be something else not run by the Noaccounts of Montecristo because of course “that food was (past tense!) their heart and their culture.” Oh! The humanity!

The unspoken theme of this little speech (and parroted constantly by the Kennedy Sisters) was that Fullerton’s City Council, and especially the evil Mayor Fred Jung, is intent on destroying all good things in Fullerton. No explanation given or needed.

Of course distraught Shana again felt no moral compulsion to relate the truth: that Les Amis‘ patio on public property was cleared out because they serially refused to pay rent to the City, and kept encroaching without legal permits. Really another lie by omission.

But let’s not not share our pseudo-intellectual windbag councilwoman’s lament. Jinan Montecristo, who owns the building, simply rented out the empty front part to some sort of Italo-something restaurant, and it is now open. If Charles had actually taken the time to trudge herself around the corner she might have learned that Les Amis was indeed, still open; and that a tenant was moving into the heretofore empty front of the building.

Not paying your bills is the best way to become a Sharon Quirk Woman of the Year!

But that would have spoiled the ongoing narrative that demands weeping for a downtrodden victim and a wicked council majority who was somehow personally responsible for the shameful and wanton destruction of the Les Amis rented patio.

You know, looking at that picture above, a couple questions spring to mind.

Is that new restaurant paying rent to the City for the area where their tables and chairs and umbrellas are now located? We know the Noaccounts of Montecristo were using it illegally for free; did poor, downtrodden Jinan relate to her new tenants that they needed a permit and a lease with the City? Hmm. I wonder.

And as a second thought, I wonder if anybody bothered to get construction permits for any new interior remodeling for stuff like plumbing, HVAC and electrical work.

November 20, 2025A Step in the Right Direction

Mission Accomplished Says Zahra. No Third Term Necessary

by The Fullerton Harpoon56 Comments

Is it true. When his lips are moving he’s generally lying, as the saying goes.

It was all about “serving,” mostly serving himself, of course. Never forget: his second big decision was to get himself appointed to the lucrative OCWD board in exchange for appointing Jan Flory to the City Council in 2019; his first big decision had been to call for a replacement election.

“Community-driven representation” means stirring up a handful of uninformed people to harangue honest council members and bully them into submission on a useless $2,300,000 trail through a blighted industrial area.

Is this a true statement or only a feint? Is it a mechanism to win sympathy for a mayoral appointment on December 16th? The latter certainly isn’t going to happen any way you slice it. Or is this a realization that his self-serving ego leap is over and that he landed in the sand some time ago?

November 17, 2025November 17, 2025Ahmad Zahra

Ad Hoc Tuah Part Five-ah. And No Laughing Matter

by Disillusioned Ex-Hippy32 Comments

Right after the City Council votes to ban nitrous oxide in Fullerton, they will discuss the creation of an ad hoc (that’s Latin, darlin’) committee of two councilmembers to work with staff to develop sales tax ballot measure language. It’s item #20 on your scorecard.

The tax idea was floated by an earlier ad hoc committee, the so-called Sustainable Budget Committee, or something suchlike. That committee ultimately decided to recommend to limit the parameters of the tax to two different special half-cent sales taxes, one for infrastructure and one for our old friend “public safety.” It was probably reasoned that they would get more support than a general sales tax, but they need a two-thirds vote of approval for a special tax – a tough nut to crack.

Of course, a General Tax increase only needs a 50%+1 threshold to pass. But you need a council super- majority – 4 votes – for that to get on a ballot, and that seems highly unlikely.

It’s been painful to watch this drawn out Kabuki and it seems as it if will go on at least until the deadline for getting on next year’s ballot. Fortunately there is little chance that Mayor Fred Jung will let the obnoxious and incompetent spendthrift “doctors” Ahmad Zahra and Shana Charles anywhere near this language-developing process.

We have all seen the way that these government-written ballot measures twist language and logic to try to fool the public to approve them. The examples are so plentiful they hardly need enumerating. Remember the ill-fated Measure S in Fullerton? Hoo Boy was that some seriously misleading bullshit. Hopefully, Jung can require a simple and honest text without the usual treacle.

My cynical side wonders how much of the infrastructure tax language will actually include funding for the cops and financial bailout for the idiotic firefighter-union-members-as-ambulance-drivers decision, or FEMA FFD expansion grant nonsense. Anyway you cut it you want those well-funded unions on board for the inevitable campaign PR campaign.

Fullerton Boohoo and the Kennedy Sisters will be crying out loudly that the fix is in by their new bogeyman – the evil Bushala Bloc – and that any ballot measure language will be crafted to fail without the steady guidance of our in-house council “intellectuals.” Tender young sprout Elijah will demand TRANSPARENCY. They may even still squawk about the need for a General Sales Tax increase, after all. But I think that Good Ship Lollipop has sailed.

Has that ship sailed? I wonder.

November 16, 2025November 16, 2025Behind Closed Doors

The High Cost of Rolling Stock

by Fullerton Engineer6 Comments

On Tuesday’s Fullerton City Council meeting staff is proposing to spend $1,400,000 million dollars on four vehicles. The items are all on the “consent calendar” meaning they’ll probably be approved unanimously and no questions asked. And that’s a shame.

The Item #9 is to spend $116,000 to fix a fire engine that was allegedly struck by a careless motorist as it left a station. The front end was damaged. While the staff report is very quick to absolve the FFD of any fault, there is also no mention of an insurance payout from the motorist. Was he or she insured? If there is a payout where will that money go?

One of the key things to understand about these firefighting machines is that they are effectively proprietary. The custom vehicle came turnkey to Fullerton from the Oshkosh Corporation of Appleton WI, who owns the builder – Pierce Manufacturing. But when you need a repair, where ya gonna go? To a Pierce approved repair shop, that’s where. In this case ReNewell Fleet Services, out Ontario way.

Item #10 is purchase of a new Compressed Natural Gas Crew truck from CTEC of Downey. Price tag? $425,000. It seems that poor old CNG Crew Truck Unit No. 551C is at the end of its service life. This truck is used for water system fixit and has a backhoe on the back – which seems like the place you would want to put it. The staff report is pretty odd, requesting the council to forgo a competitive bid process since CTEC was the only “informal” responder with a truck that fit the bill. No mention of a sole source documentation. Zip. The sales tax we pay on this item alone is a rather shocking $30,000. We may console ourselves that $5000 of that tax will go into our own General Fund.

One wonders if this acquisition isn’t akin to buying a custom fire engine in Wisconsin.

Why the Water Fund doesn’t pay for this directly points to an ongoing problem of the City comingling City expenses with those of the Water Fund, a fund that should be independent and transparent and hasn’t been for over 50 years I’m told.

Hey, that debris isn’t going to dump itself…

Item #12 is a whopper – $831,000 to buy a couple of 15′ dump trucks at $415,000 apiece, from the good folks at PB Loader Company in Fresno, via a middleman, Sourcewell, who gets government agencies a discount through a cooperative purchasing contract.

Alas, the two aged dump trucks proposed for replacement, Unit Number 562B and 565C, have also “reached the end of their reliable service life.” Of course these rigs are basically design-build vehicles which is why they are so damned expensive, and one wonders aloud if Fullerton couldn’t get 4 or 5 dump trucks ready-made for less.

Anyway, we are informed that “These trucks are critical to maintaining the City’s infrastructure and supporting rapid response during storm events, road failures, and water or sewer emergencies.” Hmm. And by the way, worry not. The money has already been budgeted in the Equipment Replacement Fund. There is no mention of what happens to the existing vehicles after they are replaced which is always a good question to ask.

Sales tax for our new super dumps? $60,000. So we get to keep about ten grand of that.