Zahra Voted To Double Les Amis Rent

The past can be so embarrassing…

Back in June, 2022 the Fullerton City Council voted to raise rents on public property in downtown Fullerton. These spaces are used by adjacent restaurants as outdoor patios. One of the the “yes” votes was none other than “Doctor” Ahmad Zahra, the Damascene Dissimulator.

Zahra-Busted
Time to come clean…..

The rent increases were big, almost doubling the cost to restaurant tenants. Here’s the old and the approved rates, and the incremental difference, from the June 21, 2022 agenda item:

The resolution to establish the new rate structure passed on a 3-1 vote. And Zahra, one of the three votes is now the self-styled “pro-small business” councilman, and is regarded as one of the ringmasters of the Poor Les Amis Club.

Les Amis, you ask? Yes, the restaurant that went years without paying rent and illegally occupied public property, and that recently had its patio stuff removed from public property at public expense.

Yard sale in progress…

A cynic might argue that the big rent increase meant nothing to the rent dodgers at Les Amis since they weren’t going to pay their rent anyhow – just like they been stalling the City for years. Neither Jinan Montecristo, owner of Les Amis, nor her youthful cub, Oliver, even showed up to complain about the new fees.

Here’s the point of this story: this rent increase is now being used by Les Amis and its loyal amis to justify the Montecristos not paying anything in rent for years, even at the old rates, and of squatting on public property without permits or agreements.

Giving truth the middle finger…

I know! Let’s let the harpy-like elder Kennedy Sister, Sharon, another sudden small business sword and shield, share the strategy in a comment on the Fullerton Observer blog:

Sharon K

Why was Les Amis patio torn down by the city before the public meeting scheduled for Dec 2 at which the fairness of outdoor dining fees will be discussed? What was the urgency? Who directed that to happen?

Asking an unintelligent question is an excellent way of avoiding an intelligent answer, especially on a blog where rejection and censorship of truth-tellers eliminates the embarrassing predicament of honest correction.

I wonder how they’ll feel when they learn the that the huge amount of back rent incurred by The Noaccounts of Montecristo is based on the action of their hero, Ahmad Zahra,

Fred Jung Leaves Democrats Becomes NPP. And 4th District Supervisor Update

Gloves are so Nineteenth Century…

FFFF is a little late with this news, but better late than….never mind.

Fullerton’s Mayor, Fred Jung, running for County Supervisor and formerly a registered Democrat, has re-registered as a No Party Preference voter. In other words – an independent.

I see this as a pretty smart move. The Democrat Party leadership in OC – made up of grifters and deadbeats who actually promote useless barnacles like Shana Charles and Ahmad Zahra – had already piled on to the Connor Traut bandwagon.

Jung’s record in Fullerton has been one of generally rejecting the usual liberal Democrat sentimental “who cares if it works so long as it’s expensive” agenda for one of practicality and a modicum of accountability, a stance that put him at odds with the Fullerton Observer/Boohoo criers and moaners and alarmists. As an independent he has the opportunity to connect with the ever-growing independent vote, as well as commonsense Democrats and even some Republicans.

Rosie addresses the Boys in the Back (of the) Room; Will they hear her?

Meantime, another candidate, Democrat Rosie Espinoza from La Habra has put a bunch of money into her campaign account – $150K, it is said. Espinoza is the Mayor and has been on the La Habra City Council for 25 years. This is bad news for fellow La Habran Tim Shaw, a former la Habra councilmember who only had $20K on hand at the end of June and, only scrapped up five grand to lend himself. Now he has to share La Habra name recognition.

Traut, on the right.

If Espinoza decides to actually spend that dough it’s also bad news for nebbish Connor Traut – the Holy Anointed Democrat in the race.

Of course Espinoza, who must be a septuagenarian by now has run for the Supervisor job two or three times already and nose dived.

Look What I Can Do!

Says the 4 year old as he spins around and waves his arms frantically for attention.

Transparency, uber alles!

And so our new acquaintance, lively young fleur Elijah Manassero presented himself after the last city council meeting in another of those pre-written emails to the Fullerton City Council.

Earlier that evening the Council passed a new ordinance making bar owners responsible for the cacophony that emanates from their establishments. At the meeting, tender Elijah, pretending to be a big supporter of small businesses, claimed that the majority of the bar owners were already in non-compliance with the new regulations.

Of course they are are. They’re in non-compliance with the old regulations, too. That’s whole point of putting a stop to the amplified music free-for-all. Sweet Elijah’s conclusion to his “argument” is that bar owners shouldn’t be held responsible because of their…irresponsibility.

Think harder…

But back to the fragile sprig Manassero’s email. The comfy chair he was sitting in in the council chambers was still warm when he hit the send button for his missive to the council. Get a load of this:

Dear City Council,

What I witnessed tonight was deeply disheartening. The decision made by this Council Majority disregarded both the data presented and the overwhelming public opposition. For those who campaigned on transparency and accountability, this vote reflected neither.

Councilmember Valencia – I encourage you to review information before meetings, not during them. The claim that Los Angeles and Orange County maintain 45-55 dBA limits is demonstrably inaccurate. These are residential limits, not commercial. Fullerton’s own consultant, Dudek, explicitly found such limits incompatible with downtown conditions.

Mayor Jung – you dismissed data in favor of personal anecdotes about your visits downtown. The code enforcement logs, which I provided, contained the evidence you seemed to be missing. Instead of engaging with facts, you deferred all reasoning to a donor and then immediately adopted his requested carve-outs. That was not impartial governance.

You also stated that you wish to be “pro-resident” rather than “pro-business.” But when the vast majority of residents who spoke opposed these limits, that justification rings hollow. Outside of one of your donor’s former bloggers, no one living downtown spoke in support. If this vote was truly about residents, then which residents are being represented?

Councilmember Dunlap – I understand the pressures of coalition politics, but I also believe you know when something is wrong. If you continue to vote with those driven by donor loyalty rather than the public good, those distinctions won’t protect you in the court of public opinion.

To Mayor Pro Tem Charles and Councilmember Zahra, thank you for your thoughtfulness and consistency. You demonstrated what it means to listen to the community and think critically about policy rather than reflexively defending it.

For weeks I’ve raised awareness about this issue through my platform. That advocacy led to coverage by Voice of OC and then KTLA, which broadcasted your decision tonight. The public is paying attention, and what they see is a Council majority choosing special interests over small businesses, culture, and common sense.

I said this before and it remains true: there’s still time to change course, but that window is closing. This was the wrong decision, and I guarantee the majority of Fullertonians agree.

I’m disappointed in tonight’s vote, but encouraged that accountability is finally catching up. Please reconsider the path you’re on before it’s too late.

Respectfully,
Elijah Manassero

Where to start picking apart this nonsense? You choose. But do linger over the part where the precious rosebud claims credit for media coverage of the issue thanks to his “platform,” whatever that may be.

The Fullerton Observer Takes Wing(s)

FFFF has learned that despite a City ban on unauthorized publications on City-owned premises, the Fullerton Observer still had a distribution rack at the Wings Café at the Fullerton Airport.

Not anymore, we’ve heard.

It appears that somebody has decided to enforce the ban, and perhaps lease language forbidding this sort of display/dissemination.

While some may mourn the removal of a partisan, bumbling, and innuendo-filled excuse for news, the FFFF Executive Board of Governors do not. After all, our news publication – an honest, educative, and entertaining was blocked from public premises last spring.

Oliver’s Twist

A few days ago Mr. Peabody brought up the case of Oliver Montecristo and his mom, Jinan, both of who popped up over the summer crying foul. Why? Because the City had the audacity to charge them “excessive” rent on the space outside their restaurant in downtown Fullerton.

Ahmad, what do I do now?

Oliver has taken to insulting Mayor Jung and councilmembers Dunlap and Valencia for their persecution of “Les Amis” and perforce, their anti-small business bias.

At first I couldn’t figure out what the deal was. Fullerton Boohoo, led by the Kennedy Sisters certainly climbed on the bandwagon quickly shedding tears, so they said. The sweet young rosebud, Elijah Manassero thought he knew a good thing when he saw it, to attack Fred Jung in order to help out Connor Traut. The narrative was great: Jung beats down the little man. News at 11.

The tender sprig even came up with a fun graphic: Les Amis bound like Prometheus by red, well, yellow tape.

The problem for Jinan and her cub Oliver’s narrative is that they have been determinedly dodging rent due to the City for 15 years while they were also squatting on public property without agreements or permits in place.

Isn’t that a terrible look for anybody, let alone people who get up in public and attack their landlords? And why oh why had the City allowed these scofflaws to stay in business on our property and to continue to grab more public real estate without permission?

Questions.

Then a commenter suggested a cozy relationship between 5th District Councilman Ahmad Zahra and the restaurant located in his district. Hmm. A little checking revealed Zahra political fundraisers held at…Les Amis. What a coincidence. Here are a couple of images from a Zahra campaign fundraiser:

Bernard, did you know rent’s been due on this property? For 12 years?
Wanna take a sidewalk? That’s our specialty!
Les Amis provides a colorful backdrop…

Zahra once held a “Pride Celebration” fundraiser of some kind at Les Amis that featured Robert Garcia – another fellow grifter, just like himself.

I wonder where the money went…

It looks like Zahra may well have persuaded impressionable Oliver to start making a nuisance of himself. Doc Zahra has certainly pitched the “Les Amis as victims” to young Elijah who has taken up the cause with liveliness.

It appears that Les Amis has become a hub of local Democrat activity on misappropriated property. And look who the most recent beneficiary:

Makes you wonder about the integrity of all concerned.

Unfortunately, this ploy of Zahra/Traut, whose ultimate goal is to attack Jung, has backfired badly. The ugly truth about Les Amis is now out of the bag and the good folk of Fullerton are entitled to know exactly when they’re going to get paid for the property Les Amis is squatting on.

A Commonsense Solution for Downtown Music

Downtown Fullerton, tucked in the heart of North Orange County, is a lively crossroads where the buzz of nightlife meets the calm of residential living. Unfortunately, not all of us are college kids eager to party till sunrise and sleep through the aftermath. Some of us — like my family and me — actually need a decent night’s rest to function. Our neighborhood is a quirky blend of bars, restaurants, and single-family homes — charming on paper, but in practice, the nonstop thump of amplified music quickly drowns out the appeal. 

The amplified music is constantly disrupting our sleep, even on weeknights when rest is necessary for school and work. This inconvenience is impossible to get used to and negatively impacts our focus, energy, and frankly our wallets thanks to the obscene amount of caffeine it takes to stay functional.

In 2023, then Councilwoman Shanna Charles stepped forward with a practical solution: a curfew on outdoor amplified music. During the week, a 10 PM cutoff would provide much-needed respite, while an 11 PM cutoff on weekends would strike a balance between nightlife and residential needs. After the curfew, bars can continue to play music inside at any volume, preserving the lively atmosphere for patrons without disturbing nearby residents.

As residents, my family and I wholeheartedly support councilwoman Charles’ proposal as we believe that this act would create harmony in the diversity of Fullerton. The proposal recognizes that while nightlife and entertainment are vital to the city’s character and economy, so too are the families, students, and professionals who call this place home. By supporting this initiative, we’re not trying to quiet the city’s energy — we’re simply asking for a balance that lets Fullerton thrive without keeping its residents awake all night.

Let’s come together in support of Councilwoman Charles’s initiative to foster a community where residents and businesses can flourish side by side. Downtown Fullerton deserves a future where its lively spirit and the everyday comfort of its people exist in balance.

The Return of the Stolen Sidewalk?

I noticed this closed session item on this Tuesday’s Fullerton City Council meeting agenda.

Almost forgotten but not gone…

Commonwealth and Harbor LLC, AKA Mario Marovic has been in litigation with the City for a long time now claiming some sort of misfeasance on the City’s part in the ongoing saga of the Florentine stolen sidewalk.

Sit down and grab some sidewalk, brother…

Friends may remember that Marovic turned out to be just as big a scammer as the Florentine Mob. After they walked away from their lease, he took over and planned to open two new bars.

It’s there, just take it.

He actually remodeled the so-called pop out without permission as part of his redesign. Oops. The pop-out belonged (and still belongs) to the City.

In the fall of 2023 the City decided it wanted the sidewalk back; Marovic wanted to open his fake Irish pub. Yes it was a clusterfuck courtesy of the boneheadedness of a City bureaucrat named Paul Dudley over twenty years ago. He talked the Council into letting the Florentines put a new building on a public sidewalk, a building addition not owned by the guys who owned the main building to which it is still attached. Oops.

A deal was struck a deal under which Marovic could get opened and the City could finally get its sidewalk back. Marovic could open Mickey’s Irish Pub bars and had until March 2024 to begin demolition of the offending bump out. The remediation work had to be done by July 2024.

March 2024 came and went; March 2025 came and went. There was no work performed. Instead Marovic continued to use the public’s building and sued the City. I hope he was paying rent to us, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t.

Another stand up DTF bar owner…

Marovic has been in breech of his agreement for over a a year and a half. For some reason the City has been playing a protracted legal game with this individual instead of evicting him from our premises for being in default. Maybe the City-folk were trying to dodge personal embarrassment – just like their predecessors have done for the past two decades. Maybe they were still hoping that Marovic, somehow, would do what he was supposed to do – a hope so incredible as to be absurd.

My hope is that no settlement is made, at least not one where the City is not fully recompensed; that Marovic pays for the City to do the demolition work (he can repair his own building exterior), covers all our legal fees, and kicks back a portion of the profit he has made using our building.

Zahra Congratulates Marovic for his lawsuit…against us.

I am not hopeful about my hope. The City can’t even seem to get Les Amis to pay their years late rent. Playing hardball just isn’t in their repertoire. My guess is that the City will vote to give Good Ol’ Mario a second chance. Or maybe they’ll just drop the thing altogether and the sidewalk will remain as is.

Transparency, uber alles!

Incidentally, I wonder if Ahmad Zahra and his young sprout Elijah Manassero will give the stolen sidewalk item the scrutiny and transparency the public needs. Bet not.

We Get Mail: The Missing Planters

More pathos…

FFFF received an email yesterday from one of our readers. I reproduce the text below:

FFFF, I was at the UP Park “community event” on the 13th. I read your post about the event and I have to say it brought some things into focus. Why were we doing the last thing first? It seemed cooked up.

Anyway, what I want to find out about is the status of the wooden raised garden bins built that day. They were supposed to be used for a community garden and now they have completely disappeared from the park.

Why?

Did the City take them away? Were they stolen? Where are they?

Hey, the Friend is right. Here’s the area where the alleged “community garden” is supposed to be. I took the picture yesterday afternoon.

No bins today…

And here’s the image from the Big Party.

Bins to the left of them, bins to the right of them…

The answers to the questions are unknown. I imagine the bins were removed by the City. But why? To protect them from graffiti? From theft? Geez, that would be a bad omen for the success of the park.

Were they in the way of the contractor now that the “Volunteer Futility” is over? That speaks volumes to the insincere quality of the community event.

You have to wonder about the sincerity of the City toward the idea of a community garden, especially from the Parks department people who would have to deal with the managerial headache with no extra budget, no extra manpower, and zero upside for them.

Anyway, if I can find out where the bins are, I’ll let our reader know.

He’s Baaack

Zahra’s ride may soon be over…

Who says “nobody” reads the FFFF blog? Well, they do in City Hall, obviously.

It turns out that “Dr.” Ahmad Zahra’s campaign committee maybe wasn’t terminated after all. It’s now back on the active list on the City Clerk’s website! Looks like the “new crew” did another oopsy.

And that’s terrific news for those of us who were looking forward to next year’s Fullerton City Council election in District 5.

Zahra rap sheet

See, Mr. Zahra faces all sorts of challenges of his own creation, and he has voluntarily made enemies where he ought not to have. Here’s a partial list of Zahra’s transgressions – stuff that his blind followers love to ignore, but issues that may resonate with the electorate at large.

  1. In the 1990s gay immigrant Zahra committed marriage fraud by marrying an American woman (a federal felony), so he could stay in the United States and pave the way for eventual citizenship.
  2. In 2020 Zahra was charged with assault and battery and vandalism against a woman, “M. Farias.” He claimed exoneration, which was a lie. He has shown no evidence.
  3. In 2020 and 2021 Zahra committed plagiarism by taking articles written by somebody else and having them published in the Fullerton Observer under his own name.
  4. In October of 2022 Zahra filed a false police report to the FPD claiming that his colleague, Fred Jung assaulted him (or some such thing). The report was rejected.
  5. In 2020 Zahra tried to raise taxes on his “underserved” peeps during the Covid pandemic.
  6. When he was first elected in 2019 he proclaimed the need for an election to fill the vacancy left by Jesus Quirk-Silva; a month later he voted to appoint the execrable Jan Flory in exchange for a well-paying appointment to the Orange County Water District, his only identified source of income.
  7. In 2022, Zahra and the OC Democrat party created a phony Latino candidate, Tony Castro, to draw votes away from his Latino opponent.
  8. Zahra is currently being investigated by the California Fair Political Practices Commission for numerous violations of campaign rules regarding unreported campaign payments that may have been illegal payments…to himself.
  9. In 2021 Zahra tried to convert the UP Park into a private, for profit event center, an illegal move that would have landed the City in multiple lawsuits.
  10. Zahra voted to pursue the disastrous lawsuit against David Curlee, Joshua Ferguson, and FFFF that cost the City the better part of a million bucks.
  11. Etc., etc., etc.
My chances are this big…

If he stays in the race, Zahra would go up against Oscar Valadez, the guy who would have beat him last time around, except for Castro, and who’s returning to the fray in 2026. Then there’s his biggest antagonist, Tony Bushala, who seems to want to make it his business to rid the city of this con artist. Mr. Bushala has the means and the motive to do so.

In 2022 Zahra spent well over $100,000 to squeak out a tainted victory. Right now he has less than six grand in his committee account. While we may expect the OC Dems to enlist another candidate to draw votes from Zahra opponents (the Scott Marowitz Experience may frighten them off), it’s hard to see a path forward for the disingenuous doctor from Damascus.