The Great Disappearing Zahra and the 2026 Aftermath

Syrian proverb: Clothes maketh the man…

Five days have passed since “Dr.” Ahmad Zahra, the Syrian immigrant fraud announced he would not run for re-election to the Fullerton City Council.

Silence is golden. Sometimes…

Crickets from the Fullerton Observer, whose sisters Sanka and Sharon have republished every utterance of Zahra, and who published his plagiarized articles without apology, have said nothing.

Other over inflated things…

They’ve published a dozen other articles – even one about some woman on Dorothy Lane who has become addicted to putting blow-up figures in her front yard. But not a solitary word about their Hero quitting in 2026.

How come?

Many people are saying it’s because Fullerton Boohoo doesn’t have a District 5 replacement plan yet, and the Observer crowd doesn’t want any surprise ordinary citizens running in next year’s election, so they’re keeping it quiet.

This doesn’t make a lot of sense since very few people in D5 read the Observer. However, common sense is a rare commodity in the precincts of Fullerton Boohoo.

A star is born?

Still, it could be true – that they are getting all the usual OC Dem endorsements in place for the first term school board member Vanessa Estrella, the candidate created for Sharon Quirk and her husband Jesus Quirk-Silva, and only plan to talk about Zahra leaving when she has a party central endorsed replacement in place. Then there’s the worthless politician endorsements to line up: you know, Lou Correa, Josh Newman, the Quirks, Tony Umberg (I forget his first name), the unions, etc., etc.; the ones that ushered Cannabis Kitty over the goal line – in second place. Oops.

In any case, there already is a candidate in running, a man who has already run a close campaign, and who would have won in 2022 except that the Usual Crowd of Dems created a fake Latino candidate by the name of Tony Castro, whom nobody has seen since 2022.

If they do run this Estrella person next year they might rerun the phony Latino dude scam of 2022; or, they might try the phony white guy candidate strategy they rolled out in 2024. They might do both. But 2026 isn’t 2024. Markowitz got pinched by the DA for perjury, and his handlers have cause for pause.

I’m not talking…

That includes Ajay Mojan the dirty little bastard involved in each earlier scam. And it certainly includes the Dems who collected Scott Markowitz’s signatures for him. Was that Aaruni Thakur? Was it Andre Charles, husband of the otiose windbag, Shana Charles? The self-righteous Diane Vena knows, and so does her confessor, Sharon Kennedy – of the Fullerton Observer.

There may be a reluctance for this rogues gallery to keep creating phony candidates to push their own ideologues, now that every candidate will be subjugated to a decency smell test.

25 Replies to “The Great Disappearing Zahra and the 2026 Aftermath”

    1. Very cranky. But it was w-a-a-a-a-y past your bedtime young Elijah. I hope you got your glass of warm milk and had Doctor Ahmad read you a story with a happy ending.

    2. Village idiot Elijah. So dumb. Your cuck Zahra was bankrupting the city long before Valadez appeared on a ballot. But don’t let facts get in the way of your opinion.

  1. I think you may be right. Somebody behind the scenes is working the Giant Cockblock to scare away possible opponents. Still, as pointed out, the Kennedy SS has no influence to pull here, except to help cover stuff up under the guise of “news for the people” which used to be on Pravda’s masthead, I believe.

    1. Exactly. It really exposes the Observer’s lack of journalistic integrity. Not that anybody thought it hadn’t been exposed long ago.

      1. The Fullerton Observer’s silence on Ahmad Zahra’s decision not to seek reelection is telling. For years, the publication has acted as his personal PR firm, running fawning articles and giving him a platform to write columns.

        A legitimate news outlet would have reported this major development immediately, seeking comment and analyzing its impact on the city council. The Observer’s silence is not an oversight; it’s a deliberate strategy.

        As your post rightfully points out is that the Observer and its “political” allies are working behind the scenes to hand-pick Zahra’s successor. By withholding this “news”, they are preventing an open public conversation and controlling the narrative. Their plan is to wait until their chosen candidate is ready, then frame the announcement not as a vacancy, but as a seamless transition to their pre-anointed successor.

        This behavior proves the Fullerton Observer is not a newspaper, but a propaganda arm for their local political losing machine. Its loyalty is to maintaining the little “power” they have, not to the truth or the people of Fullerton. The good part is that nobody, except for a room of boobs, think the same and are blinded by Boohoo-ism.

        1. “This behavior proves the Fullerton Observer is not a newspaper, but a propaganda arm for their local political losing machine. Its loyalty is to maintaining the little “power” they have, not to the truth or the people of Fullerton. The good part is that nobody, except for a room of boobs, think the same and are blinded by Boohoo-ism.”

          100% correct. It’s shameful con on the stupid, the elderly, and the uninformed. It IS elder abuse, if you think about it.

          1. Don’t forget the little kids. Remember how the sisters conned them into writing about the Trail to Nowhere in what was supposed to be an article about Fullerton’s infrastructure. It’s child abuse, too!

  2. The people who are conned into “writing” for the Fullerton Observer and the unhinged “editor” Saskia are students who they fool into doing slave labor without pay, retired university professors who feel they are morally superior to the public, water staffers Ahmad Zahra steals intellectual property from, and CHATGPT.

    1. There is a lot of indoctrination of kids attempted by the Sisters Grimm. Hopefully the little ones grow up with some common sense.

  3. Super hot take. Why does Elijah Manassero remind me of a short version of Baron Trump? FFFF put up a side by side.

  4. I just sent them a fun little comment!
    Let’s see if it gets approved!

    Hey Boogerhogger,
    I’m putting your theory to the test!

  5. “Fullerton Navigation Center Update Presented to City Council”
    by Saskia Kennedy

    All awkward AI regurgitation. Embarrassing, really. Even for shameless hustlers like Sanka and her sister.

    1. In a move that has become all too predictable, Ahmad Zahra once again manipulated the council process for personal aggrandizement. He placed an agenda item on the docket, claiming it was in response to resident complaints about a “broken microwave” at a local facility. This supposedly critical issue, which turned out to be nothing more than an appliance that wasn’t plugged in, became the flimsy pretext for a lengthy, self-congratulatory speech.

      Zahra used the entire item to grandstand, patting himself on the back for his supposed success in reducing Fullerton’s homeless population over his seven years on the council. It was a transparent and pathetic attempt to manufacture a crisis, solve it with a speech, and take a victory lap for a problem he has shown little real interest in addressing beyond photo ops and press releases. The fact that he would waste the council’s time on such a manufactured issue, all to feed his own ego, tells you everything you need to know about his priorities. What a complete crock. At least we only have to endure this for one more year.

        1. Sanka published an AI regurgitation under her own name. It included Zahra mentioning his 7 year success solving homelessness twice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *