We Get Mail. Fullerton Observer Ethics

Kennedy Sisters Lay Egg

FFFF received communication from an individual named Dr. Aaron Moore who had attempted to post a comment on the Fullerton Observer about the Les Amis Saga.

A couple days ago, I wanted to make a thoughtful yet truthful comment on the Les Amis stolen sidewalk that the city smartly put back together and reclaimed its own property, and I had a feeling that the Fullerton Observer sisters would not publish my comment…

Here’s what I said (Grey box). They did not post my comment which I thought was rather fair, and paints a more clear picture for everyone. Other comments made by the uninformed that castigated the City were published, of course.

P.S. my comment is still not published. 

Here is Dr. Moore’s comment:

So here’s a comment absolutely following the supposed Observer rule of engaging in “civil discussion” that is refused publication. Why? Because the true story doesn’t fit the narrative woven by Ahmad Zahra, the Kennedy Sisters and Delicate Sprig Elijah Manassero that the owners of Les Amis were actually victims of something or other, instead of the reality: they were serial rent dodgers and squatters for years and years and years.

Off you go. We’ll hear nothing of the kind…

But the truth? Can’t have that. It gets in the way of the fictional story. It’s too awkward and so off to the corn field goes the truth.

Forget about unethical “journalism.” We’re talking about some serious mental and moral deficiency here.

67 Replies to “We Get Mail. Fullerton Observer Ethics”

  1. It’s crazy that Fullerton has a blog owned by a major political donor who uses anonymous bloggers to attack small businesses.

    Such a joke

    1. What’s really crazy is that seemingly semi-intelligent youngsters are so easily duped by their master Ahmad Zahra a serial liar and immigrant fraud who hates small businesses so much he voted to double their rent.

    2. Should all small businesses stay in business? 50% of restaurants close within 5 years. Les Amis beat that average because they cheated taxpayers by flaunting non-payment and rolling stupid councilors to give them a pass. Don’t let your socialist views get in the way of your nonsensical argument Elijah Manassero. Kids say the dumbest things.

  2. I just use that gray box now to communicate directly with them regarding whatever nonsense they post. I know they read it, even if they never post it. I have been surprised in the last couple months that they have posted one or two, but I just believe they are too stupid to realize that they are comments that reflect negatively on them. Can’t fix stupid.

  3. With the Kennedys it’s apparent that lying for partisan reasons is the motivation. Just relying on simple stoopidity is no longer a viable excuse.

    1. Why not? The two Kennedy sisters have been screening and banning legitimate comments ever since the Markowitz Coverup.

      1. “Markowitz Coverup”

        That’s bullshit.

        As to ” The two Kennedy sisters have been screening and banning legitimate comments”

        Not that I can tell. And this claim is no more than that. I see plenty of comments get published that are contrary to their opinion /editorial positions. Why would this one be special?

          1. “Not that I can tell” is relevant because I do get these articles emailed to me, I do see the comments and I do comment myself on occasion. I’ve seen what kinds of thing get through and plenty of conservative feelings and prejudices make it through moderation.

            1. “Not that I can tell.”

              How could you tell, if they were deleted? Here’s something an honest man would do: ask the Kennedy Sisters if they are censoring comments they disagree with, and if so, why.

              But you won’t because:

              1) You aren’t honest
              2) You aren’t a man

              1. “How could you tell, if they were deleted?”

                I can tell you are an unprincipled sack of shit with low reasoning ability.

                “Here’s something an honest man would do: ask the Kennedy Sisters if they are censoring comments they disagree with, and if so, why.”

                Exactly. So instead of doing that you post unfounded accusations here in your, uh, newspaper.

                1. Unfounded? Prove it’s unfounded.

                  Off you go now and play footsie with young Elijah and the Kennedy Spinsters!

                  You’ve missed the first 2 editions of FFFFs quarterly paper.

                  You could try subscribing, but that would actually cost you something, you unprincipled sack of shit.

                2. “FFFFs quarterly paper.”

                  Quarterly! Yeah I guess I did miss that along with everyone else in town. Just like we missed getting hit by a satellite in decaying orbit. What are the odds?

                  How do we know when and where to find it? Racks on Bushalaland properties? Do I have to check astronomical charts to figure out which day to hunt for it?

                3. Not that you “can tell” if there isn’t a quarterly FFFF publication. You haven’t seen it.

                  Jesus H. Christ, you really are that slow.

        1. “Not that I can tell”…so why comment then Jerkoff John? Because you are self important and need to let people know your important opinions.

          1. It’s my way of giving back. A chance for you to benefit from judgement and knowledge that you were never privileged to acquire.

            1. The only “plenty” of commenting going on over there since they tried to steal the election is from the older loud mouth at council meetings.

              1. The only commenters are the older sister defending the younger sister and the younger sister adding editorial comment to a few comments that slipped through. And two self-important idiots named John and Amy.

                1. “As to ” The two Kennedy sisters have been screening and banning legitimate comments”

                  Not that I can tell.”

                  This is rich.

                2. Right. He can’t tell because they are banned. Hooger is a titanic moron. Too bad OCPA can’t harness the nergy he generates bending over for the unspeakable.

  4. It’s hilarious that you guys just invent letters out of thin air to justify attacking small businesses.

    There is no Dr. Aaron Moore in Fullerton. I can’t believe your 10 readers fall for this

      1. Severely left leaning.
        Along with the observer ‍♀️
        If they don’t like what you say, they do not print.

        1. Correct. We have had several commenters say that their comments were deleted before the sisters just started screening comments and posting the ones that didn’t contradict them. Journalism at its finest.

          1. “We have had several commenters say”

            That’s called a claim.

            All that’s left is for you to prove it, then you could print it in your newspaper.

            Per usual, you skipped a step.

            1. Like you ignoring the years of Les Amis ignoring rent and encroaching on City property without permits? The long history of scofflawery has been documented here, and elsewhere. You ignore it – deliberately.

              You skipped more than one step. Deliberately.

              That’s why you have no credibility.

              1. “Like you ignoring the years of Les Amis ignoring rent and encroaching on City property without permits?”

                I’d have to have known or cared about it to “ignore” it.

                I skipped no steps.

                “Scofflawery”

                FFS.

                1. Yo do know about it. And you ignored the truth.

                  That makes you a liar and a fool.

            2. I’m the one that made the OG comment John and it is still not published as of 4:06 am Monday morning, so please continue to believe the upstanding Kennedy sisters and their totally truthful publication that doesn’t censor things they don’t like. My comment was 100% fair and even kind, yet they still wouldn’t publish it. Why is that suppose? PS, you won’t find me in Fullerton because I don’t live there anymore.

              1. “Why is that suppose? PS, you won’t find me in Fullerton because I don’t live there anymore.”

                Have you asked them? Have they responded to you?

                You are saying things, but people say a lot of things at Fiends For Fullerton’s Failure.

                1. You say a lot of things in defense of the crippled brains of the Kennedy Sisters. So there’s that. Your failures are evident.

  5. Hoogerbooger has REALLY lost it. He’s resorted to turning Les Amis into the victim of the “Bushala Bloc” – reasons unknown but he “can tell” they’re there and they’re b-a-a-a-a-d.

    And now his inamorata Ahmed Akbarahra is cutting out. Even his dog Rusty hates him.

  6. It is true that The Observer censors comments, but so does FFFF and there is a trail of evidence to indict both.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *