More Observer Falsehood
In the Kennedy Sisters’ early May print edition the failing Fullerton Observer, there appeared another story about a City ban on non-government publications in City facilities. The article was supposedly written by somebody calling him/herself Matthew Ali.
The tale included a new explanation for Shana Charles flip-flop on the issue, to wit, the City Attorney previously asserted that the City of Irvine had banned this sort of stuff from their City Hall, when in fact they hadn’t. Ms. Charles and her apologists seem to feel okay hanging their hat on this flimsiest of hat racks.
In reality, Charles was pressured by Ahmad Zahra, Fullerton Boohoo, the Kennedy Sisters, and her pals at the Daily Titan to change her mind. And because Fullerton’s nonsensical “2 councilmembers can re-agendize anything they already lost” policy, it will get another hearing. And presumably another, and another, and another as “Drs.” Zahra and Charles discover ever “new” information that was denied them at the most recent hearing.
Anyhow, back to Matthew Ali, the typically incompetent Observer scribe. In the article he/she includes this completely and demonstrably false statement:
“The issue was instigated by a blog that sent a letter to the City of Fullerton threatening legal action if rack for a (currently non-existent) newspaper it said it was planning to publish was not made available for public display.”
FFFF’s attorney Kelly Aviles did send a letter to the City Manger requesting an opportunity to display a publication on City premises, and asking for guidelines, placement procedures, etc. But the correspondence requested a response only. There was no threat of legal action at all. That is a deliberate lie cooked up in the feeble and febrile noggins of “Matthew Ali” and the Kennedy Sisters.
I also add that Matthew Ali has absolutely no idea whether a publication exists or not.
Anyway, here is the actual language of the letter sent by Kelly Aviles to the City of Fullerton:
Dear Mr. Levitt:
I hope this finds you well. I am writing to you on behalf of my client, Fullerton’s Future, who’s in the process of launching a new newspaper publication to serve the residents of Fullerton. As part of the marketing and distribution efforts, my client seeks to place a newspaper rack in the lobby of City Hall, similar to the arrangements that have been made with other local newspapers.
We respectfully request the City Council grant approval for my Client to install a newspaper rack in the lobby of City Hall. My Client has secured a financial commitment from a local businessman for a significant amount of private financing to launch this new business endeavor committed to contributing to the local community by providing important local news, restaurant reviews, business advertisements, and information that reflects the diverse interests of our city’s residents and their needs for alternative news sources. In addition, an application to form a new 501-c4 will soon be filed with the IRS for this venture.
Please let me know if there are any specific procedures or requirements that need to be followed to facilitate this request or if the Council has any preferences regarding the placement of such a news rack at City Hall. We are eager to comply with any guidelines you may have.
Thank you for your time and consideration and we look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Kelly Aviles
Well, it looks like another letter from our other attorney may be in order to make the Kennedy Sisters correct more of their deliberate misinformation.
If you are qualified to write about the news because you can’t keep writers or editors because you want your pol
make the news up is the Fullerton Observer motto. Fake news.
If you aren’t qualified to write about the news because you have zero journalism experience, you can’t keep writers or editors because you only want your political perspective reflected…you make the news up. The Fullerton Observer motto. Fake news.
The Kennedy Sisters are really dumb. This is why they are so gullible. All you have to do is tell them what they want to hear and facts go out the window. That’s why people like Zahra can manipulate them so easily.
The Kennedy Sisters are useful fools.
With regard to the idiotic 2 person re-agendize interpretation, I humbly submit that Jung and Dunlap and Valencia deserve the shit sandwich they’re going to get. A simple phone call to the Ciy Manager telling him he can’t re-agendize something that’s already been decided by a majority, would suffice.
If Levitt and Jones can’t get that, it’s clear they’re working for the Council minority and should be fired for cause. IMMEDIATELY.
If only life were as easy as you make it sound. The house of delusion is cheap to build, but drafty to live in.
Thanks, Confucius.
Again, I have attempted to leave comments, but because I do not use a name that “staff” finds acceptable, they do not post my comments.
Hardly an endorsement for the first amendment by a group of hypocrites screaming about the first amendment.
That’s because the First Amendment is valuable to them when it suits their narrative Fullerton Troll. When it doesn’t, they censor just as much as the Chinese government. That Mao Ze Saskia is full of it. Look no further than her belly.
It is funny Kennedy made the editorial choice to reissue the same story 3 times to try and drum up support for her family paper. What a nasty lady!
The articles by “staff” and Matthew Ali (a made up name?) both refer to Skanika’s opposition to the the horrible censorship. Making her own news again, about herself! Priceless.
You can’t make up this sort of alt-reality.
Well, if I am being honest, it’s probably not my name that is keeping my comments from being posted. It is their reason, but my comments point out their hypocrisy and they can’t have that.
You could chain a monkey to a keyboard and get a better result than Saskatoon’s.
This blog is lying. There’s no such article in the Fullerton Observer written by a person with the name of Matthew Ali.
https://fullertonobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICFO47-08-1.pdf
Sorry, Charlie.
Something doesn’t add up. Visit the Fullerton Observers website: https://fullertonobserver.com/2025/05/03/fullerton-city-council-to-revisit-publication-ban-may-6/
The headline is: Fullerton City Council to Revisit Publication Ban on May 6
By staff on May 3, 2025.
The name “Matthew Ali” is not in the article. Either Matthew Ali wrote the article, submitted it for publication, and the sisters posted it on their blog and put it in print, but then changed the online version to “staff” before it went to print. But why?
To be clearer, the online article does not list “Matthew Ali” as the author. However, it’s possible that Matthew Ali wrote the piece and submitted it for publication. The sisters then posted it on their blog and included it in the print edition with Matthew Ali as the author. But for some reason, they changed the online version to list “staff” as the author. Why would they do that?
The Observer continues the bald faced lie as of today:
“This policy was proposed after a local blog said they wanted a rack for their non-existent print newspaper in the city hall or they would sue the city.”