Fullerton BooHoo
A BooHoo is a knee-jerk supporter of government activity – whatever it may be. Most BooHoos are self-proclaimed liberals, but very many avowed “conservatives” are nothing but titanic BooHoos – using conservatism to get themselves elected.
Observer Seeks Credibility; and City Funding
Posted by admin in Boohooism, Fullerton BooHoo, Local Media, The Observer on May 21, 2010
A Friend sent in an interesting newspaper clipping this week. It looks like Sharon Kennedy is trying to obligate the city of Fullerton to pay her Observer rag for posting public notices.
Back in March the city council decided to stop paying local newspapers to print public notices in order to prevent layoffs. An obscure set of state laws deem that Fullerton has no local “newspaper of record” and thus is not required to waste money on ad space in the back of newspapers for notices that could just be posted on the Internet.
But now it appears that Kennedy is anxious to latch on to the city teat and get her hands on the $40,000 per year that the city is currently saving. She will appear before a judge next month in hopes that her wretched rag will be bestowed with some judicial legitimacy.
Unfortunately Kennedy has failed to read the very simple laws that define a newspaper of general circulation.
For one, the paper has to be printed at least weekly. The Observer is printed bi-weekly and monthly during the summer.
Second, it has to be physically printed inside the city. The Observer is printed elsewhere.
Third, it must have “substantial distribution to paid subscribers.” The Observer is free.
And finally, the paper must have “maintained a minimum coverage of local or telegraphic news and intelligence of a general character of not less than 25 percent of its total.” We’ve said it before: most of the stuff printed in the Observer is opinion disguised as news.
If Kennedy succeeds in her wacky court case, it will force the city to pay her for publishing public notices. Perhaps the city will dispatch someone to the hearing to make sure she doesn’t get away with it.
Fullerton’s $100,000 Pension Club Welcomes 15 New Members
Posted by Travis Kiger in Fullerton BooHoo, Fullerton City Council, Statewide Stuff, Watch Your Wallet on April 8, 2010
It’s been almost a year since we published the original list of retired Fullerton public employees earning over $100,000 per year in pensions.
Since then we have learned that our state’s unfunded pension liability has grown to over $500 billion dollars. Our Friends over at California Pension Reform have updated their list of CalPERS pensions, bringing on fifteen new “hundred grand” members from Fullerton this year. That’s an increase of 40% in a single year.
So let’s see who is getting the most from largess from taxpayers. New members are in bold:
| Name | Annual Pension | Position |
| JAMES “JIM” REED | $166,781.88 | Fire |
| GEOFFREY SPALDING | $149,852.88 | Police |
| GREGORY MAYES | $148,889.40 | Police |
| MICHAEL MAYNARD | $140,317.20 | Police |
| DANIEL CHIDESTER | $139,416.72 | Fire |
| FRANK PAUL DUDLEY | $133,821.00 | Development Services Director |
| ALLEN BURKS | $133,782.36 | Police |
| DOUGLAS CAVE | $130,761.36 | Police |
| GLENN STEINBRINK | $127,533.00 | Administrative Director |
| ANTONIO HERNANDEZ | $127,402.20 | Police |
| H SUSAN HUNT | $126,970.80 | Director of Park and Recreation |
| STEVEN MATSON | $126,430.68 | Police |
| RONNY ROWELL | $125,168.40 | Police |
| TERRY STRINGHAM | $123,482.28 | Fire |
| GEORGE NEWMAN | $121,410.60 | |
| RICHARD RILEY | $121,113.36 | |
| MARK FLANNERY | $120,934.68 | Director of Personnel |
| DAVID STANKO | $120,279.84 | Police |
| ROBERT HODSON | $119,956.08 | Director of Engineering |
| ROBERT “BOB” RICHARDSON | $119,720.88 | Police |
| PATRICK MCKINLEY | $118,446.48 | Chief of Police |
| DANIEL BECERRA | $116,917.20 | Police |
| NEAL BALDWIN | $116,740.68 | Police |
| PHILIP GOEHRING | $115,076.04 | Police |
| BRAD HOCKERSMITH | $115,053.84 | Fire |
| JEFFREY ROOP | $113,618.88 | Police |
| KURT BERTUZZI | $109,255.08 | Fire |
| LINDA KING | $108,168.84 | Police |
| DONALD “DON” PEARCE | $107,972.76 | Police |
| CAROLYN JOHNSON | $107,179.80 | Library Director |
| TIMOTHY JANOVICK | $106,330.44 | |
| PAUL TURNEY | $105,747.12 | |
| RONALD “RON” GILLETT | $105,499.56 | Police |
| ARTHUR WIECHMANN | $104,153.76 | Police |
| JONATHON “JON” MCAULAY | $102,034.80 | Fire |
| RICHARD HUTCHINSON | $101,822.16 | |
| JOHN PIERSON | $101,524.92 | |
| HUGH BERRY | $100,488.84 | Assistant City Manager |
| WILLIAM KENDRICK | $100,194.48 | Police |
Remember… public employee pensions are negotiated between the unions and our city council. It’s time to figure out who has been representing the taxpayers and who has been sticking up for the unions.
Collaborative Calendar Still Dark
Posted by Mr. Peabody in Fullerton BooHoo, Pam Keller on February 5, 2010
UPDATE: Make that 29 days…and counting…
It’s now been 16 days since I first noticed, and there are still no events listed on the Fullerton Collaborative’s on-line calendar for 2010. See?
Hey! Hello? Anybody home over there? Any collaboration going on at all?
The Pam Keller Recap
Posted by Joe Sipowicz in Fullerton BooHoo, Pam Keller on February 5, 2010
Some man/woman calling him/herself 4th SD Observer started giving me and this blog a rasher o’ crap on a Pam Keller post yesterday; you know, we’re conspiratorialist wackos, yadda, yadda, yadda. This technique is common in blog circles: you try to color your political opponents as paranoid, nutsy, weird, tin foil-hatted, cross-dressing Nazis – whatever. And of course their objective is not only to marginalize you, but to divert attention from your point.
In response I was inspired to do a Pam Keller recap.
And just so my “true colors” are not seen to be in anyway unclear, here they are: Pam Keller is a hypocritical, shallow, self-serving, irresponsible public servant (and employee) whose manifest conflicts of interest make her unable to serve her constituents honestly, and who seems to be incapable of demanding accountability on the part of herself or her underlings.
There! I feel ever so much better! A veritable catharsis.
Now let’s take a peek at some of the Keller record; and I’ll keep it short(er) by just looking at stuff that has been written about her on what “admin” likes to call “our humble blog.”
Here are some items for your consideration:
1. When she ran for office in 2006 Keller promised that Fullerton residents would dictate the direction of development in town. And yet within two years Keller had voted to approve the gargantuan, staff/developer driven Amerige Court and Jefferson Commons monstrosities that involved huge get-rich-quick entitlements for their sponsors and that would stick the rest of us with the environmental impacts. Only the recession intervened.
2. When she ran for office for in 2006 Keller promised not to take money from developers. Instead she solicited developer’s contributions to her Collaborative, revenue that supported her employment. And the developers were proposing the Jefferson Commons and Amerige Court projects. Hypocrisy? Much?
3. In August of 2007, not even in office a year, Keller joined the now infamous Steve Sheldon (Jefferson Commons) $1000 per person drinkies-boat-ride-dinner fundraiser for Sharon Quirk. Also on board were the Pelican/Laing hucksters greasing the axles of their Amerige Court investment. Did Pam pay her way, or was it a gift from an importuning developer? Too easy. No prize for answering correctly.
4. Even though St. Jude’s Medical Center is a member and contributor to the Fullerton Collaborative of which Keller is the Executive director, Keller, as a city councilmember voted in December 2007 to approve their development entitlements for its massive project west of Harbor Boulevard. Conflict? Much?
5. In August and September of 2008 Keller supported keeping the public in the dark about the fact that she and her council colleagues were negotiating a retroactive pension spike for City employees. She publicly castigated Shawn Nelson for disclosing the fact that the topic was being deliberately concealed from the public.
6. In October 2008 Keller spent over $1200 in public funds for bills run up at a fancy hotel while attending a League of Cities conference in Long Beach – about 25 miles from her house.
7. In June 2009 Keller enlisted members of the OCCCO to publicly promote the fraudulent Redevelopment expansion. They sure owed her a favor since her Collaborative had funneled over $25,000 their way in 2007 for “community organizing.”
8. In June/July 2009 Keller voted for the bogus Redevelopment expansion with its evident failure to indicate any blight. The findings were a lie. Of course the expansion area had been redrawn to exclude a property Keller owns so she could vote on it. How’s that for fancy footwork?
9. Also in June 2009 Keller supported the relocation of a McDonald’s franchise about 150 feet to the corner across the street from Fullerton High – to tune of 6 million bucks. The childhood obesity issue was embarrassing since one of the Collaborative’s mission is to fight it, not facilitate it. Keller only backtracked when it became clear that the jig was up. Later that summer she proclaimed herself a “fiscal conservative.”
10. In July Keller proposed a City of Fullerton blog – without any bloggers, of course. In other words a City propaganda vehicle that would disseminate filtered information and necessarily involve city employees in censoring the unpleasantries often associated with participatory democracy on the internet.
11. In August and September 2009 our investigation into the Fullerton Collaborative and its doings discovered that the vast majority of Fullerton Collaborative expenses went to pay for Keller herself; that her hapless fellow boardmembers were woefully ignorant of her both her fund raising sources and her activities; and furthermore, that since she was considered an FSD teacher and public employee, she got to maintain her benefits thereof, but was cut loose from any District supervision to pursue her dream of philanthropy and self-promotion.
12. In October 2009 as a city council person she voted to postpone debt payments to the City from…her employer, the Fullerton School District. Sharing smiles with her boss who was sitting in the front row.
13. In December she voted to approve the fiasco-in-the-making Richman housing project scam – another staff/developer driven monstrosity (see #1, above) that even fails to address Fullerton’s most pressing housing needs (if you happen to be persuaded by such SCAG priorities).
14. In January 2010 it became apparent that for $50,000+ you can’t even hire an Executive Director that will take the time to update her organization’s on-line calendar events. Move along folks, nothing to see here!
15. In February 2010 we learned that even though Keller is a treated as teacher (for her own benefit) not only is she freed from the drudgery of the classroom, but she has apparently failed to account for her time away from FSD on political junkets, etc., as all teachers are required to do. Of course this means the accrual of unused sick/personal day time. It turns out that some real teachers resent it. How odd. Naturally FSD is clueless. Naughty!
Oh, well. That’s enough for now. No doubt more dubious Keller behavior will surface in the coming months, and as it does we will surely share it with you; and just as surely Keller’s Posse of Political Whatevers will make looking the other way into a full time job.
More Fun at NUFF Forum: The Flory Blurt
Posted by Jan Florys Dog in Former Fullerton Councilmembers, Fullerton BooHoo, Shawn Nelson on January 26, 2010
Looking down from Doggy Heaven at last night’s NUFF forum I noticed my former mistress Jan Flory in attendance. At one point during Shawn Nelson’s observation that County bureaucrats were hardly a necessity to get hitched, my one-time owner blurted a loud ejaculation.
It sounded like “who’s going to marry you?”
Well, that’s a Hell of a stupid question, besides being pretty rude to someone who’s speaking, but that’s my mistress for you. Of course if anybody pulled that stunt on her she would have smacked them with the business end of her broomstick.
Anyway, I’ll tell you who will marry people: their priests; their rabbis; their ministers; their ashram maharishis. Who cares? Why should a civil servant in a plastic robe do it under a dopey arch of fake flowers?
Jeez, I can figure that out and I’m just a dog.













Recent Comments