Comments on: Bad Company, Part I

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:17:32 +0000

That’s right!! remove it yourself, TONY!!

By: Rocky Raccoon

Rocky Raccoon — Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:24 +0000

Okay, and what is your point?

By: Rocky Raccoon

Rocky Raccoon — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:57:11 +0000

Maybe this will wake her up……..pharrrrt!!

By: thefinerpointsofreason

thefinerpointsofreason — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:22:33 +0000

Okay, so let me get this straight. The cops are paying for t-shirts to essentially say “I LOVE MYSELF.”

And let see what else: Collectively, they raised $23,360 to say, “I LOVE MYSELF.”

WTF is this: vanity day? That’s a lot of loot to pay out to wear a t-shirt that proclaims self love.

By: JustUs

JustUs — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:55:57 +0000

Did you folks hear about SB 1530 in the CA legislature? It would have made it much easier to fire pedophile teachers – after the recent story about the Miramonte teacher convicted of molesting 13 children over many years. SB 1530 sailed through the state senate with only 7 ‘no’ votes. Before going to the Assembly floor for a final vote it had to first get approved in the Assembly Education Committee. It failed to get the majority votes. The democrats voted it down. So if they want to strengthen pedophile laws against teachers who have full access to children the politicians vote it down because they’re getting their pockets padded by the unions. They let the children twist in the wind. But if they can get some political mileage out of outlawing convicted sex offenders (who have no union representing them) from city parks all vote “yes”. The hypocrisy we see on the political front is so outrageous. It all comes down to self-promotion.

By: Greg Diamond

Greg Diamond — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:31:08 +0000

Oh, the above was directed at “Wrong Guy,” not “Protect Norby’s Secrets Guy.” How much is a decal?

That “looking the other way” category is pretty broad. Would you bet B*shala’s annual income that 500 sheriffs could not be accused, using FFFF’s standards of proof, of “looking the other way”?

By: Greg Diamond

Greg Diamond — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:28:51 +0000

That’s probably true — because you would not be controlling for differences in income and such. You think that San Clemente and Mission Viejo are as hard to police as Fullerton? Even Yorba Linda, which has nothing approaching an urban center, is a weak comparison. But still, it’s a good first step.

By: Greg Diamond

Greg Diamond — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:25:10 +0000

Boo hoo yourself, Tony.

Seriously, thanks — every time I see your name it reminds me to work on the Norby piece.

By: Greg Diamond

Greg Diamond — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:24:04 +0000

If you want to do A (obtain report) because it will allow you to do B (obtain bid), it is fair to describe you as a proponent of being able to do B.

Kiger is apparently more of a proponent of threatening to do B to gain an advantage in labor negotiations that won’t begin for over a year, but that’s a lot to say repeatedly. “Proponent of a bid” is a fair summary.

By: JustUs

JustUs — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:16:38 +0000

“Show me data that demonstrates that sexual predators of children do not stalk and select their victims at places where youth congregates– including schools and parks”

It’s ludicrous to think that the large majority of sexual predator attacks occur in parks. I suspect most take place in the homes of relatives who have children. Did 3149 include forbidding convicted sexual predators who have completed their punitive obligations to the state from frequenting schools for a lifetime? If so, I must have missed that. To my knowledge 3149 focused ONLY on city parks. So either YOU are misinformed or I am. I suspect that YOU are the misinformed one here. And if so, your comment on schools is irrelevant.

Just curious. Are convicted gay adult males who frequent parks in search of sexual contacts with one another and who completed their judicial punishment banned from parks too under 3149? Does it apply to ALL convicted sexual criminals or only to pedophiles? Is a man convicted of raping a woman at a private residence who completed his judicial punishment banned from parks too? does 3149 apply to ALL sexual criminals or only to pedophiles?

“Myth my ass”

You have no evidence that most sexual attacks on children occur in city parks. Any cop who investigates sex crimes on children would confirm that only a small percentage do.
Stop perpetuating myths.