This picure was just too fun not to give a second pass. Enjoy the image of two eerily look-a-like carpetbaggers and scampaigners.

Was there separation anxiety?
Posted by admin in Harry Sidhu, Setting The Bar Low on January 30th, 2011
This picure was just too fun not to give a second pass. Enjoy the image of two eerily look-a-like carpetbaggers and scampaigners.

Was there separation anxiety?
More about Carpetbaggers, carpetbagging, Harry Sidhu, Rahm Emanuel
This entry was posted on January 30, 2011, 9:26 AM and is filed under Harry Sidhu, Setting The Bar Low. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments are closed.
#1 by Anonymous on January 30, 2011
Make sure you put the name “Rahm Emanuel” as a name tag, so that Chicagoans can understand that Orange County went through as they research him and Harry Sidhu!
#2 by admin on January 30, 2011
Okay.
#3 by Fred Alcazar on January 31, 2011
What is it about these characters that drives ego over common sense.
Of course Brother Emanuel’s got a real shot at winning. Brother Sidhu couldn’t take a leak outside of Anaheim, and even there might not be able to get re-elected at this point.
#4 by Anonymous on January 31, 2011
Why do you keep calling Rahm Emanuel a “carpetbagger”? The guy lived in Chicago for 20+ years before briefly taking a little job in Washington. Since the job in DC was just a temporary gig and his intention was always to return to Chicago, he maintained his Chicago residency.
When I think “carpetbagger”, I think of someone who moved into an area just to take advantage of the political scene, which is obviously not the case for Mr. Emanuel.
#5 by Red Dawg on January 31, 2011
#4, you have a point and a good one too.
#6 by Fullerton Rudy on January 31, 2011
Yeah, well he may have had an address in Chicago, but he didn’t live there. Sure, he used to live there. Just like Linda Ackerwoman used to live in Fullerton. Was ain’t is. Saying it is only encourages political egomaniacs.
#7 by Anonymous on February 1, 2011
Those are 2 valid but irrelevant points. I’ll concede that 1. That Rahmbo didn’t “live” in Chicago, and 2. That he’s an egomanic. Neither one of these things makes him a carpetbagger.
A voter’s place of domicile is defined as wherever “a man has his true, fixed and permanent home and principle establishment, and to which whenever his is absent he has the intention of returning”.
This is what distinguishes Rahmbo from Ackerwoman: he took a temporary job out-of-state with the intention of returning to Chicago. She flat out moved to Irvine and came back some time later to take advantage of a political opportunity. She’s a carpetbagger; he is not.
I’ll also give you your second point (that Rahmbo is an egomanic). He may be a power-hungry blowhard with an agenda, but it does not make him a carpetbagger.
I’m afraid that we’re cheapening the definition of “carpetbagger” by throwing it around so easily. It is a powerful word and it should be reserved for people like Sidhu and Ackerwoman.
#8 by Ignoranceisbliss on February 3, 2011
Speaking of carpetbaggers,has Tony reregistered to vote in his correct addresss yet?