“Public Art” on the Lemon Street Overpass; Are The Inmates Running The Asylum?


No, that’s not just crazy talk.

I was just sent the next Public Art Commission’s agenda in which City Staff is proposing that over $100,000 be spent “restoring” those dubious murals that adorn the Lemon Street pedestrian overpass. Here’s the text of the staff report:

ATTACHMENT A
Staff Recommendation for Public Art

After reviewing reports and treatment proposals from contracted professional art historians and conservators, staff has a recommendation for how to proceed with the Lemon Park Murals.  The goal of this recommendation is to make progress on the restoration of these important historical pieces of public art in a way that is fiscally responsible and takes into account the directive of the Public Art Committee to continually produce new works while maintaining the City’s rich existing collection.  We therefore propose that restoration take place over 5 years.  The proposed preliminary plan is as follows:

Year One:

Fall, 2010

Work with the Public Art Committee to revise the list of potential locations for new/restored work to be produced over the next 5 years.

Spring, 2011

Restore “Zoot Suit Riots.” using the services of a professional mural restoration team.  The cleaning, consolidation of paint and coating layers, graffiti removal, reintegration (touch-ups) and protection is estimated to total $18,000.  “Zoot Suit Riots” is an ideal starting place for mural restoration because the historical significance of the subject matter and its strong aesthetic appeal, and key location.

NOTE: Lemon Park and Maple Community Center renovation project will be under construction in the period beginning between summer – fall 2011.  The construction period is estimated at 9 months.  The start date for construction will be pending Lemon Park Committee review/recommendation, although it is likely to start in the fall of 2011, to avoid disrupting summer youth programs at the park.

Spring – Summer (production), 2011

Neighborhood youth will be recruited (coordinated with City summer youth programs at Maple Center) to design and execute a new mural that expresses the themes of cultural pride and community solidarity originally intended by the mural entitled “Fullerton.”  The existing mural, which is much degraded and heavily vandalized, will be thoroughly documented and covered with a protective varnish, then painted over.  The new mural will be processed through the standard application and review procedure by the Public Art Committee. It will be produced by neighborhood teens under the supervision of a professional artist and with input from the Lemon Park Ad Hoc Advisory Committee, and will take its place thematically and visually in the suite of paintings that makes up the entire park.

Fall, 2011
The Public Art Committee will oversee the production of a new, permanent public art piece at the main stage in the downtown plaza.

Year Two:

2012

Restoration of “The Virgin of Guadalupe” and “Girl with Car. Estimated cost (combined) of $32,000.

Based on progress on the Transportation Center Master Plan, we will install a new piece of public art in the pedestrian corridor between Spadra restaurant and the bus depot.  Suggestions for this area include three-dimensional awning type installations that invite access to the transportation center and visually expand the downtown and event area south of Commonwealth.

Year Three:

2013

Restore “Calle Elm” and “Come Back Again” by a professional mural restoration team. Combined cost of $24,640

Produce a new piece based on Public Art Committee recommendations

Year  Four:

2014
Restore “La Adelita” and “Cross with Crown of Thorns.” Estimate (combined) cost of $26,000

Produce a new piece based on Public Art Committee recommendations.

Year Five:

2015

After four years of restoration we will have some idea how the Lemon/Maple murals are faring and how the new mural produced in year one has been received by the community.  With this experience the Committee can develop recommendations for “Brown Car.”  This mural has been vandalized numerous times and sustained considerable additional damage since the November, 2008 preliminary report.  Based on the current rate of destructive activity, staff does not believe that the estimated $21,000 required for a thorough restoration would be fiscally responsible.  Two possibilities present themselves:  we could invest in moderate restoration and additional anti graffiti coating to keep the mural intact for as long as possible despite what seems to be relentless vandalism.  Or we could document the piece, cover it, and create a new mural under the direction of a professional artist and with the input of community groups such as the Lemon Park Ad Hoc Advisory Committee.  Both options present obstacles and opportunities and it is hoped that our experience restoring the other pieces of the original suite over the preceding 4 years will equip us to make a wise choice in 2015.

Note:  The murals “The Town I Live In”  “Niños del Mundo” and “La Mujer Latina” are in relatively good condition at this time and are not included in this 5-year restoration plan.  They will be maintained as needed (graffiti removed, coatings restored, etc.)

Public Art Committee Agenda
July 26, 2010

These paintings have been the source of some controversy for quite some time. Critics question the gang references as well as the deterioration and gang graffiti they seem to invite. Others doubt the artistic value.

Although some folks in the community have suddenly taken a proprietary interest in the murals, this interest doesn’t seem to extend to actually paying to clean them up.

In 1995 the restoration of the Kassler Mural on the side of the Plummer Auditorium only cost about $25,000 – of which half was made up of a matching Redevelopment grant. Hundreds upon hundreds of volunteer hours were spent stripping and cleaning that work of art. That participation proved the value to the community.

So the question is: who really wants to “restore” the Lemon Bridge murals, and what are they willing to pay for it?

Email This Post To A Friend Email This Post To A Friend

  1. #1 by Christian on July 30, 2010

    Tax dollars to PROTECT and MAINTAIN “art” that reflects what MANY feel is Fullerton’s gangbanger lifestyle? On the heels of another drive by shooting that left a 17-year old dead? Are you serious? How about protecting the other “art” that gets painted around town? How about giant FTT signs at the City limits? Wake me up when City Hall gets cleaned up!

  2. #2 by Homie D. on July 30, 2010

    You go ahead and paint it all up. Me and my homies gonna tag it up again.

  3. #3 by Joe Sipowicz on July 30, 2010

    I’m wondering why the graffiti isn’t just as authentic a popular artistic expression as what is supposed to be art.

    Just sayin.’

  4. #4 by Mike on A Mission on July 30, 2010

    Now we know why God invented sandblasting.

  5. #5 by Fullerton Rudy on July 30, 2010

    Good post. City finances are a total disaster and somebody wants to elevate this to some sort of priority.

    Looks like we’ve got a campaign issue!

  6. #6 by Who Cares on July 30, 2010

    I think this needs to be designated as a “historical district”. That way Fullerton Heritage Group can be involved cause they always know what’s best and we can also have the Planning Commission put in more rules about how this can be preserved. That should get the price up to at least $500,000. At that price we can’t resist to preserve it.

  7. #7 by Rain on July 31, 2010

    The $100,000 proposal should be rejected and all those on city staff who participated in developing and approving the proposal should be fired, at the same City Council meeting.

  8. #8 by van get it da artiste on August 2, 2010

    if I remember correctly, a local artist with the last name Reeder, desperate for money to fund his graduate studies, took on the original mural project that required involving fullerton’s local gang bangers so to prove to that productivity may arise from the unlikely persons and places, told me he did most of the work while the gang bangers flicked paint onto passing cars or hapless pedestrians. the continued vandalism of these murals may just be their karma

  9. #9 by gabriel san roman on August 2, 2010

    calm down. i love these murals and yes they should be restored. there’s no controversy about them. it’s car culture, not gang culture. just think of it as chicano nascar or monster trucks or something…

    It’s a five year plan which averages out to 20gs a year…less than the 1995 (not adjusted for inflation) one-time restoration of one mural cited.

    Tell me how much money was spent on the “Moco Seco” district up the street

    • #10 by Joe Sipowicz on August 2, 2010

      “Moco Seco”

      Dry booger? Too funny. But not relevant. Tens of millions have been wasted in DTF, but that’s not justification for doing anything.

  10. #11 by Common Sense on August 2, 2010

    $100,000? Sorry, no sale. That mural on the Plummer is priceless.

  11. #12 by gabriel san roman on August 2, 2010

    Yes, Joe! The dry booger! I just can’t call it the “Soco” as that would be too boring.

    I also can’t call Downtown Fullerton “DTF” as it confers a coolness onto it that it doesn’t deserve! (but that’s just a personal pet peeve of mine)

    C’mon, I’ll take all you FFFers to a Thee Midnighters concert one of these days! ‘The Town I Live In’ is Chicano Soul, not Cholo rap!

  12. #13 by Joe Sipowicz on August 2, 2010

    DTF isn’t cool. It just reflects my laziness!

(will not be published)


 

Subscribe without commenting