What Color Is Pam Keller’s Parachute?


Won't take money from developers...

You will never see me taking money from developers...

Green?

We’ve been sharing information (when we find it) with our Friends about the unusual – well, unique, really – relationship between the Fullerton Collaborative and the Fullerton School District. Fullerton City Council woman Pam Keller is the Executive Director of the former, but remains an employee of the latter. We’ve coined a term for the process – “contracting-in.” It’s such a rare strategy that we’ve never actually seen it in use before.

Many of our Loyal Readers’ eyebrows have been caused to arch by the possibility that Pam Keller might have been soliciting donations for The Collaborative that actually went to pay FSD for her own services. And those eyebrows got even closer to hairlines when speculation began that Pam may have been soliciting donations from interests that had business before the City of Fullerton.

Today we share the 2009-2010 agreement between the Collaborative and the FSD – agreed upon by the Board of Trustees unanimously and without discussion as a ”consent calendar” item.

PamKeller-2009-2010-Contract

Notice the asterisk in item #1 of the Collaborative’s responsibilities. It leaves open the possibility that the District may give the Executive Director a raise – and stick the Collaborative with the bill! Now we ask you – what kind of an organization would agree to an open-ended codicil like that in a contract? We’ll help out: one in which the Executive Director (who is also a board member), is the direct beneficiary, that’s who!

We also note in the 2009-10 FSD budget documents a throw away line stating that the Collaborative kicked in extra money to the FSD. It’s noted in that little box at the bottom of the document (below). Now why would the Collaborative do that? What kind of “charity” gives additional money back to a contractor? Possibly a charity whose fund-raiser’s efforts are so successful that a surplus exists which could be kicked back to the District to pay for that raise described in item #1 of the agreement. Of course we’re just speculating here.

Resolution for Expenditure

But, none of these speculations would be so thought provoking if the Collaborative’s mission weren’t so fuzzy, and if it had major expenses other than the cost of hiring a government employee to be its Executive Director/fund-raiser. But the mission is so loose as to be practically meaningless, and the cost of the Executive Director consumed most of its budget in 2007.

All of this really ties back to the fundraising issue and who actually gives money to the Collborative. But it’s perfectly clear now that the funds – donations, fees, whatever -  that go into the Collaborative, go to pay Keller – via the FSD; the question of additional “revenue” given to the FSD by the Collaborative opens up a new issue for people who contribute to this endeavor and who might start wondering why the Collaborative can’t be run by its own employee, or better yet, by volunteer labor.

More about ,

Email This Post To A Friend Email This Post To A Friend

  1. #1 by warrior for fullerton on September 4, 2009

    Give her a “one way” bus ticket to Chicago and let’s call it a day!

  2. #2 by pissed on September 4, 2009

    This looks REALLY bad. Someone needs to demand an investigation by the school board NOW.

  3. #3 by Emily K. on September 4, 2009

    I’d be smiling from ear to ear too if I were on that gravy train. What a scam!

  4. #4 by the blog truth god on September 4, 2009

    Money laundering, hmm…

  5. #5 by The Fullerton Harpoon on September 4, 2009

    It seems prett clear that nobody at the FSD has paid any attention to this arrangement. At least not lately.

    What’s more problematic is why the Collaborative (in so far as it is anything other than a Pam Keller vehicle) tolerates this situation in which there appears to be very little oversight of the Executive Director.

    The board has lots of explaining to do to its contributors.

    Of course if the contributions are being made for other than philanthropic reasons…

  6. #6 by Bill S. on September 4, 2009

    Giver her a break. At least she got rid of that Henry V haircut.

  7. #7 by the blog truth god on September 4, 2009

    FPPC?

  8. #8 by admin on September 4, 2009

    hey blog truth god, what about “FPPC”?

  9. #9 by just a guy on September 4, 2009

    Yes, FFFF should Collaborate with the FPPC.

  10. #10 by van get it da artiste on September 4, 2009

    no investigation, no recall, no peace. I’m disgusted by keller and her minions that litter fullerton’s bureaucratic broom closets and the city council meetings. Keller must realize that this illegal activity will cause her teaching credential to be revoked for immoral/criminal conduct. Poor, pammy, I guess she will have to join the rianks of fullerton’s tin miners on trash collection days

  11. #11 by warrior for fullerton on September 13, 2009

    get on down the road to Chicago now Pammy!
    they have some community organizer jobs open as an inmate at the crooked politicians prison!

Comments are closed.