This morning we received the following e-mail from a Friend:
Dear FFFF, some of your posters keep using the term “Repuglican.” I am not sure if this is simply a typo or if you mean to use this unusual term. Can you please clarify? Thanks.
Sure. Be happy to. This locution is no accident. It is a fusion of the words Republican and repugnant, from which you may draw the obvious conclusions.
Here is a definition from the Uban Dictionary:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=repuglican
We apply the term to describe local Republicans of the same ilk, although the issue of “neo-conservativism” is largely irrelevant here. These individuals are people who pursue the politics of partisan affiliation for its own sake, but also for what they can get out of it. The main thing, the only thing, really, is to stand for the Party (as a convenient vehicle for self-promotion, of course!), and of course to oppose the Other Party. Issues themselves mean almost nothing except as way to promote themselves in the wider context of promoting the Party. Inner conviction means little; philosophical beliefs mean little – except for getting and hanging on to the strings of political power in order to pull and persuade them in your direction.
Repuglicans love big business interests because those are the guys with the money; the high-rollers who will enable your “conference” in Maui.
A red bastion in a blue state, OC is chock-full of Repuglicans - who use the local municipal and County governments for their own advancement and enrichment. The Legislature is hopelessly Democrat, but this does not mean that the doors to fun and profit are completely closed to Repuglicans. Especially if they hang around long enough.
This is a Repuglican:

Hell, I'm really doing you guys a big favor...
And so is this:

We never let go...
Here’s another one:

You gotta work the angles...
And here’s one of the best examples:

My lips are moving...
Additional examples of the species are welcome!


#1 by Soon To Be Former Elephant on October 6, 2009
I know lots of these types. They manipulate the ignorant rank and file into getting behind them. Once they’re in its me me me and the hell with the rest of you.
Ackerman and Royce are two of the worst ‘pugs. Baugh and Fuentes are not far behind, if not ahead! You guys nailed it.
#2 by How about... on October 6, 2009
John Lewis. He’s supporting a Dem for Supervisor! That act would normally depugify someone except that he’s doing it to line his own lobbyist pockets. And that makes him the worst ‘pug of all.
#3 by Don't forget. on October 6, 2009
Matthew Cunningham – Repuglican toady. Is that redundant?
#4 by How about... on October 6, 2009
Sounds good to me!
#5 by Fullerton Shadow on October 6, 2009
Naw, he’s just small fry. The true Repug has used his repugniciousness to actually attain some real rank.
#6 by Don't forget. on October 6, 2009
Well what if he sends his wife.
#7 by retired iron worker on October 6, 2009
As a lifelong Republican, I’m finally fed up with the way the GOP operates.
Ron Paul was the only true Republican in the race, but he was too smart, loved freedom and liberty, instead we got Sarah Palin and Mike McClame.
Repuglicans, what a perfect word.
#8 by J.J.M. on October 6, 2009
“finally”, what took you so long?
#9 by Michelle Quinn on October 6, 2009
A republican mean’s not sitting on your ass and letting your state/country go down the drain.
So how many of you really are “republicans”, or are you just dems who watch fox news?.
#10 by The Fullerton Harpoon on October 7, 2009
Huh?
#11 by van get it da artiste on October 7, 2009
i will trade a repuglican for a representative in government. come the next elections in 2010, repuglican royce and his minions along with the dumacrats, I will vote out and vote in anyone who acts after he or she listens to what the people want instead of telling us voters what we should want from government.