Friends, check out the Linda Ackerwoman campaign expense report at the California Secretary of State’s website.
We noticed this odd line item.
| 10/19/2009 | ACKERMAN, DICK | OFFICE EXPENSES | $654.40 |
Ackerwoman’s campaign forked over $654 bucks to her husband under the crypric description of “office expenses.”
Heh heh. Never miss a trick.
Could Dick actually be charging his wife’s campaign for some sort of services rendered? Well, why not? She made a killing as a “consultant” on his campaigns, and what the Hell, turnabout is fair play, right? Too bad the campaign won’t turn a profit.
We do have to wonder what kind of total Dick will rack up by the time Ackerman, Inc. is done squeezing every drop out of lobbyists.
#1 by WTF on November 6, 2009
10/28/2009 PROBOLSKY RESEARCH LLC POLLING AND SURVEY RESEARCH $14,375.00
#2 by admin on November 6, 2009
Ackerman, Inc. contracted for two polls on the same day, one to the Prob and one to JMJ
10/28/2009 JMJ ASSOCIATES POLLING AND SURVEY RESEARCH $6,500.00
#3 by Kindof A Party Hack on November 6, 2009
What about the $2,232.60 that was paid to Dick for “fundraising events”? Now he’s getting paid to fundraise for her? This is really pathetic and beneath him.
I am surprised that they would be so petty and cheap as to try to wrench a few nickles out of the campaign.
#4 by The Fullerton Harpoon on November 6, 2009
Party Hack, where did you find that $2232.50?
#5 by Kindof A Party Hack on November 6, 2009
Read it in the disclosure document way down on one of the last pages
#6 by Kindof A Party Hack on November 6, 2009
Page 51 of 59 to be exact
#7 by The Fullerton Harpoon on November 6, 2009
Help with a link?
#8 by Kindof A Party Hack on November 6, 2009
try this: http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/PDFGen/pdfgen.prg?filingid=1453898&amendid=0
or just go to the Brown County article about “things looking grim” written by the Jerbal himself and click on the link for Linda’s campaign expenditure
#9 by D. Rodriguez on November 6, 2009
The arrogance on part of Ackerman, Inc. to think that they can sneak into NOC, trash Chris Norby, and get his wife elected to represent “us” in Sacramento while “they” live in Irvine. Despicable.
#10 by Go Figure on November 6, 2009
Looks like the Problobsky is ripping off Ackerman, Inc. $14,375 for a poll that JMI is doing for less than half.
That’s called “piling on” Adam, and it’s a 15 yard penalty.
#11 by just a guy on November 6, 2009
Anyone dumb enough to donate to the phony Ackerman campaign deserves to have the money pocketed. I hope they have a really nice dinner to celebrate their loss, courtesy of suck-ups Jones and Bankhead.
#12 by just a guy on November 6, 2009
And maybe that $14,375 to Probolski was to pay for those threatening letters from Jones Day on behalf of his girlfriend.
#13 by Jan Flory's Dog on November 6, 2009
Bingo!
#14 by just a guy on November 6, 2009
10/22/2009 Calif. Beer & Beverage Distributors – $1,000.00
Well, that explains Ackerman’s beer ad. Exact same date, too.
#15 by ScarletPimpernickel on November 6, 2009
Ackerman and his wife; We can only hope that instant karma will get them one day.
#16 by Jan Flory's Dog on November 6, 2009
Hate to be pedantic scarlet but if karma gets them “one day” it won’t be instant. Arf. Woof. Can’t fool me. I helped my mistress pass the bar back in the day.
#17 by The West-Side-Guy on November 7, 2009
We heard that Problobsky charges the candidates a bunch of money then conjures up numbers to show them winning the race. They believe it and keep paying him. Fat boy smoke and mirrors.
Just like Hackerman. Slime!